Well, it is about time we start considering these classifications as applicable to men as well. These labels can very well be applied to men's behavior as well. I do not understand why people are apparently so loathe doing this. I do not understand why people think that a male that is promiscuous, spreads diseases, causes unwanted pregnancies is somehow a "stud," "big man on campus," or whatever.
I can imagine that there is a grown-up responsible professional woman who is very dignified and respectable. She is possibly in her early thirties. She has enough respect t for herself to be fully-clothed at all times out in public.
Perhaps she does view men as being either virtuous and pristine and respectable, or as whores. Either-or, just like how public society views women.
She is condescending towards men that do this because she knows that men have developed emotions that make them weak and vulnerable. She considers men that do this to be broken and psychologically damaged. Sorry, but men simply cannot divide sex from emotional contact without some loss and damage to psychological, emotional health.
Some males may brag that they can. But she fails to see how this, ah, characteristic is anything worth bragging about. They distance themselves from their own emotions, thinking that they are helping themselves, but they are not. They put a concrete dividing barrier between their sex and their emotions. How is this psychologically and emotionally healthy?
If a woman does it, it is not the same for the following reason. They can get pregnant, which is sort of a price to pay, or a "punishment," if you will, for having had illicit sex. This woman must pay a far higher price with her life than a man in a similar situation. The male donor might just skip town, or he might choose to stay. However the two of them decide to work things out in this situation. At any rate, he would not have to go through the emotional and physical ordeal of pregnancy. And he possibly might not even be in the picture by the time the kid is born and has to be raised as a child.
It's simply that males do not possess delicate endothelial membranes, nor delicate sensitive mucous membranes. So it does not manifest physically. They do not get inflammation of the ovaries or the uterine lining. They do not contract as severe a case of human papilloma virus as females do. But make no mistake, they are whores that have sold their soul to the culture of loose, commitment-free s-x.
So in this way, a woman can redeem herself for having been possibly promiscuous. She wouldn't even necessarily have to model her life after the textbook definition of "promiscuous." She might have just had unprotected sex once, and this one act of pleasure brought about a giant burden of sorts that forces her to have to become more strong and powerful. For herself and for her offspring.
I can imagine that there is a grown-up responsible professional woman who is very dignified and respectable. She is possibly in her early thirties. She has enough respect t for herself to be fully-clothed at all times out in public.
Perhaps she does view men as being either virtuous and pristine and respectable, or as whores. Either-or, just like how public society views women.
She is condescending towards men that do this because she knows that men have developed emotions that make them weak and vulnerable. She considers men that do this to be broken and psychologically damaged. Sorry, but men simply cannot divide sex from emotional contact without some loss and damage to psychological, emotional health.
Some males may brag that they can. But she fails to see how this, ah, characteristic is anything worth bragging about. They distance themselves from their own emotions, thinking that they are helping themselves, but they are not. They put a concrete dividing barrier between their sex and their emotions. How is this psychologically and emotionally healthy?
If a woman does it, it is not the same for the following reason. They can get pregnant, which is sort of a price to pay, or a "punishment," if you will, for having had illicit sex. This woman must pay a far higher price with her life than a man in a similar situation. The male donor might just skip town, or he might choose to stay. However the two of them decide to work things out in this situation. At any rate, he would not have to go through the emotional and physical ordeal of pregnancy. And he possibly might not even be in the picture by the time the kid is born and has to be raised as a child.
It's simply that males do not possess delicate endothelial membranes, nor delicate sensitive mucous membranes. So it does not manifest physically. They do not get inflammation of the ovaries or the uterine lining. They do not contract as severe a case of human papilloma virus as females do. But make no mistake, they are whores that have sold their soul to the culture of loose, commitment-free s-x.
So in this way, a woman can redeem herself for having been possibly promiscuous. She wouldn't even necessarily have to model her life after the textbook definition of "promiscuous." She might have just had unprotected sex once, and this one act of pleasure brought about a giant burden of sorts that forces her to have to become more strong and powerful. For herself and for her offspring.