When did feminism degenerate into a horrid lagoon sewer monster that lurks under the streets and bridges and feeds off of the anger and despair of the people??
Once upon a time, feminism was wonderful. Actually, it was not just once; it was many times upon a time. This is because it agreed with all the female traits of natural suspicion of others, self-respect, and morality.
but now it has mutated and devolved into a victimhood-slash-entitlement mentality.
As it is, the current spate of feminism wants to cultivate a generation of females that have no self-preservation instincts whatsoever. Feminism has become about not taking any responsibility for oneself whatsoever.
Don't worry about taking care of yourself ever. Someone else will always do it for you.
the thing about drunke rfpf.
feminism cannot and should not be about perpetuating liberal myths and liberal brainwashing of the mass populace. falsehoods and the-emperor-has-no-clothes masking of stuff that is truly misogynistic, and only masquerading as "empowering" women, when in truth they __ but in a much more devious sneaky, underhanded, and also passive-aggressive, gutless, cowardly manner.
1. don't worry about taking care of yourself ever, someone else will always do it for you.
what femnin has become lately is, "accept any boneheaded decision that ny female makes." hence the sleepign wiht a guy
2. part 2
drugs, alcoho. and then getting druken rp.
yes, yes, I know. I agree once hundred percent. it is sick and nasty, it most definitely IS r, no matter what the manosphere tries to wtwist skewer around workds, doublespeak, doublethink.
2. wmn are dumbasses
wwell why would she be so easily manipualted?
suppsoedly womn fall in with bad boyd bc bad boys have somethig to offer -- exceitement.
but i HAVE to tell you, I seriously have a hard time bleiveing this. I don't think this this is the reason at all. if they watned exceitenment, they can go kayaking. or traveling. wiht a nice guy who treats them right. but no, instead they
it is bc they are easily manipulated and brn-controlled into thinking that it is okau
retards
1. men as sassholes
you see how naiive and stupidly trusting they are.
__you see how sweete and helpful and nurturing they try to be. help a stranger with carrying heavy bags or something.
that is sick. that is vile, that is disgusting, that yu would take advantage of someonw like that who is trying to be helpful AND trusting. yeah, there's a word for that. it's called being an ahole.
6. once upon a time, there was this thing called women's intuiition. it was real, it was there, and it was good. sure, it has been countlesysly mocked in pop culure and watercooler jokes. but it serfved its purpsoe well.
but then liberalism started beatig women int he head with, "if you odn't go out with that guy, you are racist and closedminded and judgementtal." if you ask the guy to confirm his identity, and reveal his past and his sexual history, and his criminal history, you are pre-judging him. be more open-minded. don't be so quick to judge him."
they mysteriously skipped over the part where, the female was not even given a chance to know enough about the guy to have anything to judge.
I dont dknow why women did not stop for a few monemnt and think, wait a minute. if being chosedminded and judgeental keeps me safe and alert and not a crime victim, then maybe those traists are not bad things.
oh, come on , you're a stonrg capable woman in charge of your own life, who cares if society says you shoud not walk down that ddark alleyway. defy society and do it anuyway.
I had already noticed this and was repulsed by it several years ago. But it was readiyl recognized for the hot mess that it was. it was not really truly mainstream. I got the impression it was not really taken that seriously, not by sane rational feminists. it did not define femins,. ittt was not the widespread rampant___
it was most certainly not the accpeted public image. nobobdy really ever called that "femisnism." it was called "empowerment" and "liberatoin," but not "femisims."
therre were still many, many owmen out in news media who appeared to readily refute it. (((put long list of "storng intell women here.)))
there were many women who stil championed merits of oldschol femisnis [[ideals,traits]]]]
that femisnti requires intelligence, hard work, diligence.
tons of children's books [[trumpeted the virtues of rolling up your sleeves and doing work.]]]]]
But the thing is, it takes the background of growing up in a stable loving two-parent home to produce an intelligent, aware woman who cares about the world. It takes a stable childhood to produce a woman that wants to go to college, major in something useful, not waste time or health drinking or partying or screwing around, and then get a useful and honest job. In other words, it takes a stable home to produce a feminist.
glorifying inept stupid incompetent females, turning them into heroes. which is the antithesis of feminism. sarah palin, bridget jones, ally mcbeal, tons of others in pop culture media that I really don't have the inclincation nor energy to keep track of.
It is hugely insulting, it is offensive to intelligent women who had to work hard to earn the post of authority and power that they do. Women who have the talent and skill to do a job. Characters like this are implying that just because a woman is female she is gaily waved into the door and all the usual checkpoints have been waived so as not to bother her. This is like saying affirmative action did all the work and the woman did nothing.
society used to keep able, intelligent women *out* just because they were women. now society is letting unable, unintelligent women *in* just because they are women.
I remember last year I noticed the odd double standard that liberal feminism champions. The thought occurred to me, "So if a woman does not take orders from a group of men, she is strong. But if a man does not take orders from a group of women, he is weak?" You know how that is some silly liberal logic, that a man that will buck up, sit down, shut up, and take orders from his woman is strong; is man enough to take orders from a woman; is secure in his masculinity;; and that's why supposedly he does not feel intimidated by "strong" women. Where is the consistency in that? Where is the logic?
Well, wait a munte. just beause a girl cuts thoru the back woods as ashortcut does not mean she is rsisking her safet.y she is just walking home. that is not the same thing as getting drunk with strangers. not even close. ___==__
that whole thing, abt, welll why dont' you first give me alist of all the stupid things women do to screw up their lives.
;;ohh so THEY have to look out for your safety and health and well-being, but you don't have to look out for your OWN safety and health and well-being.
Once upon a time, feminism was wonderful. Actually, it was not just once; it was many times upon a time. This is because it agreed with all the female traits of natural suspicion of others, self-respect, and morality.
but now it has mutated and devolved into a victimhood-slash-entitlement mentality.
As it is, the current spate of feminism wants to cultivate a generation of females that have no self-preservation instincts whatsoever. Feminism has become about not taking any responsibility for oneself whatsoever.
Don't worry about taking care of yourself ever. Someone else will always do it for you.
the thing about drunke rfpf.
feminism cannot and should not be about perpetuating liberal myths and liberal brainwashing of the mass populace. falsehoods and the-emperor-has-no-clothes masking of stuff that is truly misogynistic, and only masquerading as "empowering" women, when in truth they __ but in a much more devious sneaky, underhanded, and also passive-aggressive, gutless, cowardly manner.
1. don't worry about taking care of yourself ever, someone else will always do it for you.
what femnin has become lately is, "accept any boneheaded decision that ny female makes." hence the sleepign wiht a guy
2. part 2
drugs, alcoho. and then getting druken rp.
yes, yes, I know. I agree once hundred percent. it is sick and nasty, it most definitely IS r, no matter what the manosphere tries to wtwist skewer around workds, doublespeak, doublethink.
2. wmn are dumbasses
wwell why would she be so easily manipualted?
suppsoedly womn fall in with bad boyd bc bad boys have somethig to offer -- exceitement.
but i HAVE to tell you, I seriously have a hard time bleiveing this. I don't think this this is the reason at all. if they watned exceitenment, they can go kayaking. or traveling. wiht a nice guy who treats them right. but no, instead they
it is bc they are easily manipulated and brn-controlled into thinking that it is okau
retards
1. men as sassholes
you see how naiive and stupidly trusting they are.
__you see how sweete and helpful and nurturing they try to be. help a stranger with carrying heavy bags or something.
that is sick. that is vile, that is disgusting, that yu would take advantage of someonw like that who is trying to be helpful AND trusting. yeah, there's a word for that. it's called being an ahole.
6. once upon a time, there was this thing called women's intuiition. it was real, it was there, and it was good. sure, it has been countlesysly mocked in pop culure and watercooler jokes. but it serfved its purpsoe well.
but then liberalism started beatig women int he head with, "if you odn't go out with that guy, you are racist and closedminded and judgementtal." if you ask the guy to confirm his identity, and reveal his past and his sexual history, and his criminal history, you are pre-judging him. be more open-minded. don't be so quick to judge him."
they mysteriously skipped over the part where, the female was not even given a chance to know enough about the guy to have anything to judge.
I dont dknow why women did not stop for a few monemnt and think, wait a minute. if being chosedminded and judgeental keeps me safe and alert and not a crime victim, then maybe those traists are not bad things.
oh, come on , you're a stonrg capable woman in charge of your own life, who cares if society says you shoud not walk down that ddark alleyway. defy society and do it anuyway.
I had already noticed this and was repulsed by it several years ago. But it was readiyl recognized for the hot mess that it was. it was not really truly mainstream. I got the impression it was not really taken that seriously, not by sane rational feminists. it did not define femins,. ittt was not the widespread rampant___
it was most certainly not the accpeted public image. nobobdy really ever called that "femisnism." it was called "empowerment" and "liberatoin," but not "femisims."
therre were still many, many owmen out in news media who appeared to readily refute it. (((put long list of "storng intell women here.)))
there were many women who stil championed merits of oldschol femisnis [[ideals,traits]]]]
that femisnti requires intelligence, hard work, diligence.
tons of children's books [[trumpeted the virtues of rolling up your sleeves and doing work.]]]]]
But the thing is, it takes the background of growing up in a stable loving two-parent home to produce an intelligent, aware woman who cares about the world. It takes a stable childhood to produce a woman that wants to go to college, major in something useful, not waste time or health drinking or partying or screwing around, and then get a useful and honest job. In other words, it takes a stable home to produce a feminist.
glorifying inept stupid incompetent females, turning them into heroes. which is the antithesis of feminism. sarah palin, bridget jones, ally mcbeal, tons of others in pop culture media that I really don't have the inclincation nor energy to keep track of.
It is hugely insulting, it is offensive to intelligent women who had to work hard to earn the post of authority and power that they do. Women who have the talent and skill to do a job. Characters like this are implying that just because a woman is female she is gaily waved into the door and all the usual checkpoints have been waived so as not to bother her. This is like saying affirmative action did all the work and the woman did nothing.
society used to keep able, intelligent women *out* just because they were women. now society is letting unable, unintelligent women *in* just because they are women.
I remember last year I noticed the odd double standard that liberal feminism champions. The thought occurred to me, "So if a woman does not take orders from a group of men, she is strong. But if a man does not take orders from a group of women, he is weak?" You know how that is some silly liberal logic, that a man that will buck up, sit down, shut up, and take orders from his woman is strong; is man enough to take orders from a woman; is secure in his masculinity;; and that's why supposedly he does not feel intimidated by "strong" women. Where is the consistency in that? Where is the logic?
Well, wait a munte. just beause a girl cuts thoru the back woods as ashortcut does not mean she is rsisking her safet.y she is just walking home. that is not the same thing as getting drunk with strangers. not even close. ___==__
that whole thing, abt, welll why dont' you first give me alist of all the stupid things women do to screw up their lives.
;;ohh so THEY have to look out for your safety and health and well-being, but you don't have to look out for your OWN safety and health and well-being.