This is the same thing that has been done before. This shocking realization occurred to me, slowly but surely. It is now simply packaged and wrapped up in a different superficial yarn.
Wow, you're just trying them all on for size, aren'tcha?
It seems there have been three different approaches to this 3h:+. And whoever was selling it will say whatever they need to say, to keep females submissive and stupid. And disgustingly, derogatory, demeaning, treated like sex objects, objectification, treated like pieces of meat. It seems that misogynists will do absolutely whatever they have to do to promote their sick agendas. They will say whatever they have to say, they will talk out their necks, they will talk out their azzez. They will doublespeak, they will contradict themselves, they will doublethink. They will use some skewed, twisted pretzel logic.
First it was, "you are a worthless piece of 3h +, you have to do this, you have no choice. You are a female, you have to serve males in whatever way they see fit to their whimsy. You are slaves, you are weaker, less intelligent, less capable. b----, you are a slave, you are a piece of property, that's all you are good for, so lick their toes. You better consider yourself damn lucky that a man, any man, thought you worthy of being f---able."
This was the norm throughout pretty much all of human history.
Second, then the misogynists were thinking, "well, that's not really selling anymore. So let's try to appeal to females' sense of femininity and trying to please their man (known in the popular lexicon as females' "sense of reason" and "logic")." their sense of constantly trying to please people, constantly trying to get people to like them. Constantly hoping, "ohgosh, I hope they like me, ohno did I offend them, do they still like me, do they still think I'm a sweet adequate friend?"
Misogynists try to convince females that it's the right thing to do to act this way, try to reason with them. Break them down gently, kill them softly, gradually break down their sense of self and dignity and pride. Don't you _agree_ that males are stronger, more intelligent beings, more capable, more worthy of respect?' "Males should not be treated like pieces of meat because of course they are full complete human beings with feelings and hopes and dreams, but you are not. Shouldn't you put aside your own hopes and dreams and instead just try to please them and give them what they need? Squash and bury and pulverize into dust any possible hopes or dreams of your own because those are not important. You should not be so selfish, you should be completely supportive and selfless and sacrifice your own well-being so that they may attain happiness. Well, don't you *want* to be submissive and greet him warmly and soothingly at the door being naked with a martini, clear away all clutter, wrapped all in saran wrap, speak in a soft soothing voice? Don't you want to please your man?"
This was the prevalent wave of misogyny that was especially documented circa the 1700s and 1800s, and legendarily the 1950s.
Third, now very recent, some misogynists realized, "Oh 3hi+ 3hi+ that's not working anymore, oh no what do we do? How do we make this for mass appeal? What is it that they say they want? They want liberation, empowerment, independence, self-confidence. We know! Tell them this 3hi+ is liberating, empowering, will make them independent, and will give them confidence. You have to be careful just to use the *terms,* the vocabulary words. For god sakes, don't use the actual meanings! You know -- the definitions you find when you take the time to look up the words in the dictionary. Don't actually promote liberation and empowerment and thinking for themselves. Because then they might start to actually think for themselves and realize that the sellers are just blowing a lot of hot air out their asses. No no, a lot of females are mostly stupid. Just use the vocabulary words, and they will see that and immediately think that what we are selling is real."
This is a sick, grotesque, morbid, ludicrous travesty (parody) of what feminism is supposed to be.
Wow, you're just trying them all on for size, aren'tcha?
It seems there have been three different approaches to this 3h:+. And whoever was selling it will say whatever they need to say, to keep females submissive and stupid. And disgustingly, derogatory, demeaning, treated like sex objects, objectification, treated like pieces of meat. It seems that misogynists will do absolutely whatever they have to do to promote their sick agendas. They will say whatever they have to say, they will talk out their necks, they will talk out their azzez. They will doublespeak, they will contradict themselves, they will doublethink. They will use some skewed, twisted pretzel logic.
First it was, "you are a worthless piece of 3h +, you have to do this, you have no choice. You are a female, you have to serve males in whatever way they see fit to their whimsy. You are slaves, you are weaker, less intelligent, less capable. b----, you are a slave, you are a piece of property, that's all you are good for, so lick their toes. You better consider yourself damn lucky that a man, any man, thought you worthy of being f---able."
This was the norm throughout pretty much all of human history.
Second, then the misogynists were thinking, "well, that's not really selling anymore. So let's try to appeal to females' sense of femininity and trying to please their man (known in the popular lexicon as females' "sense of reason" and "logic")." their sense of constantly trying to please people, constantly trying to get people to like them. Constantly hoping, "ohgosh, I hope they like me, ohno did I offend them, do they still like me, do they still think I'm a sweet adequate friend?"
Misogynists try to convince females that it's the right thing to do to act this way, try to reason with them. Break them down gently, kill them softly, gradually break down their sense of self and dignity and pride. Don't you _agree_ that males are stronger, more intelligent beings, more capable, more worthy of respect?' "Males should not be treated like pieces of meat because of course they are full complete human beings with feelings and hopes and dreams, but you are not. Shouldn't you put aside your own hopes and dreams and instead just try to please them and give them what they need? Squash and bury and pulverize into dust any possible hopes or dreams of your own because those are not important. You should not be so selfish, you should be completely supportive and selfless and sacrifice your own well-being so that they may attain happiness. Well, don't you *want* to be submissive and greet him warmly and soothingly at the door being naked with a martini, clear away all clutter, wrapped all in saran wrap, speak in a soft soothing voice? Don't you want to please your man?"
This was the prevalent wave of misogyny that was especially documented circa the 1700s and 1800s, and legendarily the 1950s.
Third, now very recent, some misogynists realized, "Oh 3hi+ 3hi+ that's not working anymore, oh no what do we do? How do we make this for mass appeal? What is it that they say they want? They want liberation, empowerment, independence, self-confidence. We know! Tell them this 3hi+ is liberating, empowering, will make them independent, and will give them confidence. You have to be careful just to use the *terms,* the vocabulary words. For god sakes, don't use the actual meanings! You know -- the definitions you find when you take the time to look up the words in the dictionary. Don't actually promote liberation and empowerment and thinking for themselves. Because then they might start to actually think for themselves and realize that the sellers are just blowing a lot of hot air out their asses. No no, a lot of females are mostly stupid. Just use the vocabulary words, and they will see that and immediately think that what we are selling is real."
This is a sick, grotesque, morbid, ludicrous travesty (parody) of what feminism is supposed to be.