This Whole Mess Needs To Go Crashing Down

"oh those conservative Christians butt their noses into wmns's personal private business."

Well, that's laughable.  Evidently they're not aware of it, but these females most certainly butt their personal private business into conservative Christians' noses.  All you see everywhere is shameless exhibitionist crap.  In those stupid videotapes for sale of spring break crap, in mtv, in women's magazines, in rolling stone magazine, in Time magazine, in Newsweek magazine.  It is everywhere.  They are violating their own damn privacy just fine without needing conservatives to lift a finger.

So, sorry, but no.  I have a hard time attaching any credibility to your claim that you want people to keep out of your sex life.  Not when you idiots are so freakin eager to shove your sex life into people's faces.

And another thing.  These same media magazines nn schitt keep saying
--- ""ohhhh those evil Christians keep ***judging,*** keep butting thms into women's personal private sex life,
and they keep tellig wmn when they can and csntt have sex, and they keep telling women who they can and cantt have sex with.
--- ohhh weeee don't judge women for hvig sex.
--- ohhh but not liek us.  Weeee dont tell women when they can and cannt have sdx.  Noooo never
---- nooo we tell women that they should be hving sex all the time.  We actively encourage women to have sex.""

Hang on a cotton-pickin minute.  What do you liberals mean, you "encourage women to have sex?"  What do you mean you tell women, "go ahead and have sex with that dude on your first date, we won’t judge you!  As a matter of fact we will actively applaud and congratulate you for having sex!!!""
--- ""in fact, we think it's weird if a woman is nOttt having sex frequently with any man she can get her hands on!!  So as you can clearly see, we don't judge women's sex lives.""""

Who the hell are you to tell women that they "should" be having sex?  And if she is not, then who the hell are you to say she is somehow less of a woman?  Who the hell are you to "encourage" women to have sex?  How is that any of youuuir goddamn business?

These liberals keep complaining that conservatives butt their noses into women's personal private business.  Well, guess what.  In truth, liberals also butt their noses into women's personal private business.  Liberals are nothing more than perverts that have now taken over magazines.

I had also caught some crappy French movie on cable that featured a teenage girl.  There was a creepy skanky middle-aged guy in the movie that seemed to be the typical pain-in-the-azz "open-minded" liberal type.  All throughout the movie, this... creature made derogatory comments about his ex-wife because the ex-wife refused to be a slut.  I felt relieved that that poor woman had gotten the hell out of there.  At one point this creature made a comment that was disgusting slang for "that girl is old enough to hurry up and have sxxee."

Uh, excuse me?  How the hell is it any of this sick ahole's goddamn business if that girl is having sxe?  Need I remind you that that girl is only a teenager.  She doesn't need to be having serrxx.  More importantly, it is none of that perverted fluck's business if she is having sxee.  Who the hell is this sick ahole to insist that a girl, a teenager, a **child** should be having sxe?

Liberals vs. Conservatives On Personal, Private Matters

This is something I have been deliberating and turning over in my head for the past whole year.  I just have not been able to articulate it into a coherent essay until now.

This whole mess needs to go crashing down.  It should crash and crumble, but hopefully only causing absolute minimal damage.  Then it needs to be wiped and scrubbed clean away, it needs to extricate itself from people's lives so that it does not cause any more social depravity.  Then social order and decorum needs to be restored.

This is when I shook myself awake and realized, wait a minute.  I am doing the exact same thing.  I read/heard several female characters in movies and stuff, or pop culture icons that have definitely had sex.

And I thought, "Oh that’s good, they pass muster because they are definitely not virgins.  They are on par with the general rhetoric of modern day."  I was watching a Charlie Rose interview of a playwright author. She wrote a play called "Dirty Blonde" centering around Mae West's life, one of those actresses from the early days of hollywood.  At one point in the interview she remarked that mae west "had been with a lot of men. A lot of men. Which I think is a good thing."  I remember being inexplicably cheered by that.

They always complain and moan and groan about how the religious right-wing conservatives, “How dare the conservatives pass judgment on wmn that have had sex!”  They squawk and spew, “How dare those evil judgmental conservatives judge women for having sex!!!  They're so evil!!!!”

These irritating, self-proclaimed liberals complain because religious conservatives assert that a woman's only worth is based in her sexuality.

They might have a semi-solid congealed argument -- if they didn't do the exact same thing.  For all their hemming and hawing about how the conservative religious zealots judge women based on sex, liberals do the exact same thing.  Only the liberals approach it from a slightly different angle.

The liberals also fervently believe that a woman's only worth is surrounding her sexuality.  There is abundant overwhelming evidence toward this fact.  They are every bit as culpable.

These liberals keep saying that conservatives butt into women's personal private business.  Oh, but <they> sure as hell don't seem to have any problem worming their way into women's personal, private business.

Liberals are always spewing preachy, didactic crap about how a woman is NOT worthy of attention if she IS a virgin.  They judge women for NOT having sex.

Actually, they do even worse than that.  They actually go a couple rungs lower.  They go so far as to say that unless a woman is a slut, that she is not worthy of their brand of "respect."  (Guffaw.)  They are every bit as judgmental as the conservatives.  Only in their skewed, warped sense of morality, they judge a woman as being somehow less of a woman if she has NOT had multiple sex partners.

They complain that religious conservatives do not approve of a woman if she has sex.  But shockingly, liberals do not approve of a woman if she has <not> had sex.

They don't even necessarily bring up the topic of virgins specifically.  According to them, if a woman is not a full-fledged slt, then she is automatically deemed a prude.  Unworthy of acknowledgment, not worth recognition as a whole human being.

In the grand scheme of things, sex before marriage per se is not really that big of a deal.  I get that.  There are much more pressing concerns to deal with in life.  Many people have had sex with their boyfriend or girlfriend before they actually walk down the aisle.

However, it is not just a matter of females or males having sex.  That is not "good enough" for the perpetrators of those aggravating women's mags.  They concern themselves with sheer numbers.  And they insist, absolutely insist, that staggering numbers alone is what determines the degree of strength/independence/etc. of a woman in today's modern world.

Read one of those stupid women's magazines.  They accuse women of being a prude if she simply possesses some self-respect, and would rather prefer not sleep with anything on two legs.  (Or three or four, whatever.)  look at TV -- Will and Grace, Friends, Sex and the City.

It sure as hell ain't just the women's magazines.  It is teeming, festering the airwaves all over creation.
that if they do not drown themselves in the pool of filth__
__that if they do not suffocate themselves in prnnn and striging and prostituion, and if they do not shout from the mountaintops that it is empowering.
if they do not abjectly smother themselves into the__

They lob accusations at her that she is not being "free" with her body.  They hurl [[[__putative ]] that she does not have this silly, notorious, ubiquitous, and incorrectly-defined (I'm pretty sure) "body confidence" that has been popping up all over the airwaves like weeds.

They accuse her of not being a strong capable woman in charge of her own life.  They accuse her of being ashamed of her body.  They claim that she is somehow unable to navigate this modern world as a strong, capable, independent being that is able to take care of herself in this day and age.  (By the way, do they sound like broken records to anyone else?  They keep using that asinine phrase "strong capable woman in charge of her own life" so much that it has lost any meaning whatsoever.)

The liberals wring their hands and concern themselves with whether or not women have had sex -- just as obsessively as they accuse conservatives of doing.  They have made it their personal duty_____
And if a woman has not, then she does not earn the liberals' approval.

Never mind the fact that sex is an extremely personal, private issue.  These liberals, simply by dint of being liberals, think that they have the -[[[[[unridled, unabashed___no no.... they should be un___ like when govt. can go in and just infringe on people's inalienable rights.]]]]] right to___