I've found that when people glorify the mob and mafia like they did with the "Sopranos" TV show and other violent forms of entertainment, they try to hide behind the so-called "free speech" defense. I find that this is a constant, recurring glitch of nearly all movies and TV shows that center around violent crime. However, it is usually a cover-up for the fact that they do not *truly* have freedom of speech.
You producers, creators, actors, etc. are so damn fascinated with the mob. You say that it is a social problem that no one addresses. You constantly defend your morbid obsession with mafia and crime. You hail yourselves as some sort of social trailblazer, renegade,
But if you truly thought the mafia is a huge social problem that needs to have the spotlight put on it, then why don't you do a news report on the real mafia? Go undercover, delve into the world that consumes your curiosity and fascination. Go straight to the source and get your information raw and fresh. Go do some digging and collecting and gather a great scoop.
Instead of addressing a real social phenomenon, you are merely glorifying it by presenting it as glamorous, sexy, desirable, and worthy of attainment.
This is not journalism. This is BS. This is what is creating social problems. This is not bringing social problems to light, trying to raise awareness, or working on creating a solution. This is not freedom of information. You ARE the incidents that true journalism would be making people aware of as news pieces. You are no better than the prostitution, drugs, or gang violence that we see on the six o'clock news.
If you are so damn occupied and worried about the mafia, if you think it is such a pressing social concern, then why don't you report on the *real* mafia? Instead of glorifying it and in essence lying to the viewing public, why do you not do some investigative journalism and uncover the facts about the real mafia? What's stopping you?
Ohhh -- it is because the mafia will not let you. It is because the mafia will not allow you to do the news report. It is because the mafia will murder you for exercising the constitutional right to having unbridled access to information. In other words, you do not have true freedom of speech.
//After all, what good is free speech, if no one will hear you?
oliver stone's violence-obsessed movies.
then why the hell don't you report on that? if youre so damn worried ab womn fgett rs , then why the hell don't you do an investigative journalism report on that? yoiu know, like the news and increase awareness?
(For: why not do a journalistic pc on the real mafia?
They say___
Like Veronica Guerin. Have you ever heard of her? This woman had balls of iron (ferrous)))). She had bigger cojones than the combined external genitalia of all you fake poser hollywd blockbuster wannabes combined.
Notice I said she "had."
So you *admit** that you do not have true access to information. You do not have ___
____Upon threat of death, dismemberment, disembowelment__
You do not have access to information.
That is the case *despite* the fact that this is something that the general public definitely have a right to know about. They drf hv a rtd to be fully infr on this thing that___
I read the news mags. Thes people are vile flith.
They have an annihilating effect on society. They are responsible for prrdn, prsti, dangerous stret drugs.
___they perpetuate...
A 'nooo want to show how truly violi the mob/maddffia is.'
Q Well then why not showcase it in all its mundaneness?
A 'well thnn. People really wdl not watch it; it has to be exciting.''
Ahh so in other words you fully admit that you would not have true freedom of speech if you really told the full unfiltered truth. Noone would pay attnention; no one is going to care;; no one is going to [[__]]]. After all what good is free speech, if noone will hear you????
this is not journalism. this is bs. this is creating social problems. this is not bringing social problems to light, trying to raise awareness, or working on (creating) a solution. this is not freedom of information. you ARE the incidents that journalism would be making people aware of as news pieces. you are no better than the pr, drugs, gang violence.
You producers, creators, actors, etc. are so damn fascinated with the mob. You say that it is a social problem that no one addresses. You constantly defend your morbid obsession with mafia and crime. You hail yourselves as some sort of social trailblazer, renegade,
But if you truly thought the mafia is a huge social problem that needs to have the spotlight put on it, then why don't you do a news report on the real mafia? Go undercover, delve into the world that consumes your curiosity and fascination. Go straight to the source and get your information raw and fresh. Go do some digging and collecting and gather a great scoop.
Instead of addressing a real social phenomenon, you are merely glorifying it by presenting it as glamorous, sexy, desirable, and worthy of attainment.
This is not journalism. This is BS. This is what is creating social problems. This is not bringing social problems to light, trying to raise awareness, or working on creating a solution. This is not freedom of information. You ARE the incidents that true journalism would be making people aware of as news pieces. You are no better than the prostitution, drugs, or gang violence that we see on the six o'clock news.
If you are so damn occupied and worried about the mafia, if you think it is such a pressing social concern, then why don't you report on the *real* mafia? Instead of glorifying it and in essence lying to the viewing public, why do you not do some investigative journalism and uncover the facts about the real mafia? What's stopping you?
Ohhh -- it is because the mafia will not let you. It is because the mafia will not allow you to do the news report. It is because the mafia will murder you for exercising the constitutional right to having unbridled access to information. In other words, you do not have true freedom of speech.
//After all, what good is free speech, if no one will hear you?
oliver stone's violence-obsessed movies.
then why the hell don't you report on that? if youre so damn worried ab womn fgett rs , then why the hell don't you do an investigative journalism report on that? yoiu know, like the news and increase awareness?
(For: why not do a journalistic pc on the real mafia?
They say___
Like Veronica Guerin. Have you ever heard of her? This woman had balls of iron (ferrous)))). She had bigger cojones than the combined external genitalia of all you fake poser hollywd blockbuster wannabes combined.
Notice I said she "had."
So you *admit** that you do not have true access to information. You do not have ___
____Upon threat of death, dismemberment, disembowelment__
You do not have access to information.
That is the case *despite* the fact that this is something that the general public definitely have a right to know about. They drf hv a rtd to be fully infr on this thing that___
I read the news mags. Thes people are vile flith.
They have an annihilating effect on society. They are responsible for prrdn, prsti, dangerous stret drugs.
___they perpetuate...
A 'nooo want to show how truly violi the mob/maddffia is.'
Q Well then why not showcase it in all its mundaneness?
A 'well thnn. People really wdl not watch it; it has to be exciting.''
Ahh so in other words you fully admit that you would not have true freedom of speech if you really told the full unfiltered truth. Noone would pay attnention; no one is going to care;; no one is going to [[__]]]. After all what good is free speech, if noone will hear you????
this is not journalism. this is bs. this is creating social problems. this is not bringing social problems to light, trying to raise awareness, or working on (creating) a solution. this is not freedom of information. you ARE the incidents that journalism would be making people aware of as news pieces. you are no better than the pr, drugs, gang violence.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment