I have noticed a disturbing trend as of late. Atheists are just as incessant in their assholery as religious fundamentalist zealots, although they attest different reasons to this assholery from those of the religious freaks. One thing that both groups have in common is that they have their various strawmen to which they hitch their personal creeds.
At the heart of all this is the plain fact that atheists are not necessarily logical and scientific. They are simply looking for other BS excuses to exact torture and abuse against people that they deem inferior, such as women and colored folk.
Atheists are harboring latent loosely-suppressed criminal tendencies, particularly hatred against women. Atheists are apparently [[[__hiding,
They have their common litany with which they defend their depraved tendencies. Atheism is based in logic and reasoning.... Atheists have arrived at this conclusion thru informed decisions and rational thinking...
Oh, bullshyte. You don't like logic. You hammer the same misogynistic bullshyte that religious fundamentalist zealots cum over. At least religious extremists have the decency to acknowledge that the concepts they advocate and promote are not based on any logic or reasoning whatsoever. They freely admit that these antiquated notions are handed down to them from ghosts in the sky and voices in their heads.
It’s just that atheists no longer have a beastly spectre to blame for their prejudgments and repetitive tropes. So they have to turn to other sources. "I know! Let’s just call it science. Considering the abysmal ignorance of science by the general public, they won’t know any better and can be easily fooled."
Now, to be sure, I do not want to trivialize the seriousness of the crimes against humanity that religious zealots perpetrate.
However, look at the court system. Why is it that in a r--- trial, the victim of the crime is the one that is put on trial? I thought the court system and atheists were supposed to be [[[_propenders__]]]] of logic and reasoning?
I'm not just gleaning this from TV shows. I have read up on several different court trial transcripts.
Who thought of video games where they rack up points based on how many women they can r--- and murder? Who thought up those complex mythology worlds where they again r--- women, buy and sell women like cattle, trade women like objects of currency?
Creepy, disgusting, useless nerds. I am specifically talking about the sick nerds that use nerdy skills -- computer programming, writing code, building CG interfaces -- for the express purpose of living out fantasies of disemboweling women. You know, those video games where they dismember women, and then repeatedly r-- each severed limb.
(Nothing against useful nerds such as those that research particle physics or possible cures for cancer. I am a nerd myself. I fully appreciate the existence of normal nerds.)
Who thought up the concept of forcing children into prsks? Who thought up kidnapping women in Russia from their homes and forcing them into___
Guess what, folks. Religious types did not do any of that. Non-religious types did.
Ohhhh yeeeeeaaaahhhh, atheists are sooooo totally respectful and benevolent towards women. All evidence toootaallly points towards this. They thump ideologies of treating women like interchangeable wh---s, chattel, material possessions. Their opinion -- and do not forget that this is all opinion and conjecture anyway -- is termed "evolutionary biology." And they have the gall to call this "science."
They produce and create movies with gory scenes of r--- and dismembering of women. And they call this "creativity."
Geez, at least religious fundamentalist zealots do not labor under any pretense whatsoever that their psycho antics are based in logic. At least religious zealots are honest. They come right out and say, "Do what we tell you to do because our deity orders you to. You are stupid and have no right to freedom of thought. We order you to do what we say, infidels."
Atheists are almost worse than religious fundamentalists, for the reason that they try to assert their ideals are logical. They have their entire fawning, sycophantic pseudo-intellectual audience convinced that their actions are rooted in "logic."
"Oh, but it's logic," you say. "It's rooted in scientific and biochemical evidence," you say.
[[Regarding atheists and r----pp by evolution, as opposed to Christians and their r----ppp by marriage. (And how god is a man, and man is created in god’s image, a husband takes his wife as property ;;;))
Yes, they have their boogeymen -- and you have yours. You deflect responsibility away from yourself through various causes du jour, same as they do.
I say, you can assign whatever semantics you want. You can call it biological factoids, you can call it chemical equilibrium, you can call ___ , you can say that the Easter Bunny made you do it, you can attest it to schizophrenia, you can say the devil made you do it, you can call it an act of G-d, or perhaps in your case, an act of Alistair Crowley. There is no difference. It is still rape. "Ohh but it's evolution, it's totally 'science.' We're waayy better than the religious fundamentalist zealots nuts that say God lets males re-- women."
You may blame whatever bogeyman and straw men that you like. But it does not matter to anyone that exists outside your pretty little head which imaginary friend you choose to shunt responsibility to, now does it?
At the heart of all this is the plain fact that atheists are not necessarily logical and scientific. They are simply looking for other BS excuses to exact torture and abuse against people that they deem inferior, such as women and colored folk.
Atheists are harboring latent loosely-suppressed criminal tendencies, particularly hatred against women. Atheists are apparently [[[__hiding,
They have their common litany with which they defend their depraved tendencies. Atheism is based in logic and reasoning.... Atheists have arrived at this conclusion thru informed decisions and rational thinking...
Oh, bullshyte. You don't like logic. You hammer the same misogynistic bullshyte that religious fundamentalist zealots cum over. At least religious extremists have the decency to acknowledge that the concepts they advocate and promote are not based on any logic or reasoning whatsoever. They freely admit that these antiquated notions are handed down to them from ghosts in the sky and voices in their heads.
It’s just that atheists no longer have a beastly spectre to blame for their prejudgments and repetitive tropes. So they have to turn to other sources. "I know! Let’s just call it science. Considering the abysmal ignorance of science by the general public, they won’t know any better and can be easily fooled."
Now, to be sure, I do not want to trivialize the seriousness of the crimes against humanity that religious zealots perpetrate.
However, look at the court system. Why is it that in a r--- trial, the victim of the crime is the one that is put on trial? I thought the court system and atheists were supposed to be [[[_propenders__]]]] of logic and reasoning?
I'm not just gleaning this from TV shows. I have read up on several different court trial transcripts.
Who thought of video games where they rack up points based on how many women they can r--- and murder? Who thought up those complex mythology worlds where they again r--- women, buy and sell women like cattle, trade women like objects of currency?
Creepy, disgusting, useless nerds. I am specifically talking about the sick nerds that use nerdy skills -- computer programming, writing code, building CG interfaces -- for the express purpose of living out fantasies of disemboweling women. You know, those video games where they dismember women, and then repeatedly r-- each severed limb.
(Nothing against useful nerds such as those that research particle physics or possible cures for cancer. I am a nerd myself. I fully appreciate the existence of normal nerds.)
Who thought up the concept of forcing children into prsks? Who thought up kidnapping women in Russia from their homes and forcing them into___
Guess what, folks. Religious types did not do any of that. Non-religious types did.
Ohhhh yeeeeeaaaahhhh, atheists are sooooo totally respectful and benevolent towards women. All evidence toootaallly points towards this. They thump ideologies of treating women like interchangeable wh---s, chattel, material possessions. Their opinion -- and do not forget that this is all opinion and conjecture anyway -- is termed "evolutionary biology." And they have the gall to call this "science."
They produce and create movies with gory scenes of r--- and dismembering of women. And they call this "creativity."
Geez, at least religious fundamentalist zealots do not labor under any pretense whatsoever that their psycho antics are based in logic. At least religious zealots are honest. They come right out and say, "Do what we tell you to do because our deity orders you to. You are stupid and have no right to freedom of thought. We order you to do what we say, infidels."
Atheists are almost worse than religious fundamentalists, for the reason that they try to assert their ideals are logical. They have their entire fawning, sycophantic pseudo-intellectual audience convinced that their actions are rooted in "logic."
"Oh, but it's logic," you say. "It's rooted in scientific and biochemical evidence," you say.
[[Regarding atheists and r----pp by evolution, as opposed to Christians and their r----ppp by marriage. (And how god is a man, and man is created in god’s image, a husband takes his wife as property ;;;))
Yes, they have their boogeymen -- and you have yours. You deflect responsibility away from yourself through various causes du jour, same as they do.
I say, you can assign whatever semantics you want. You can call it biological factoids, you can call it chemical equilibrium, you can call ___ , you can say that the Easter Bunny made you do it, you can attest it to schizophrenia, you can say the devil made you do it, you can call it an act of G-d, or perhaps in your case, an act of Alistair Crowley. There is no difference. It is still rape. "Ohh but it's evolution, it's totally 'science.' We're waayy better than the religious fundamentalist zealots nuts that say God lets males re-- women."
You may blame whatever bogeyman and straw men that you like. But it does not matter to anyone that exists outside your pretty little head which imaginary friend you choose to shunt responsibility to, now does it?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment