Back when I was in high school___
Looking back on it now, I now realize that this in fact revealed several things about the girls. They would be ready and willing to accept responsibility for their decisions and their actions. Because of this, they would most likely be better decision makers, they would weigh the pros and cons, the possible risks of making a major decision such as starting to sleep with someone. This is not an action they would take lightly or regard casually.
They have a hell of a lot more respect for their bodies than the typical liberal. They do not see or accept themselves as mere toilets for males' semen to be deposited, semen waste disposal systems.
They already knew about themselves that were they to discover that they were pregnant, they knew they would keep that child, and they would regard it as a child, a human being, and not just a lump of lifeless flesh to be discarded. This means that they know they would love their child, even if it did come about from a casual encounter.
As for the boys, I realize now that they only parroted out loud the notion that they are pro-abortion due to r-- to make it more palatable for people. For what sane human being___
But their internal motivations most likely did not concur with this at all. Far from it. Their real motivations were that if they accidentally got someone pregnant form casual sex, they could just throw some dollar bills at her the way you would with a stripper or a pros, and bark at her to go take care of it. What the hell would that mean, though? They don't want to be saddled with the responsibility of accepting the consequences of their decision, of their actions, order her to "go take care of it."
---------
Both sides, liberals and conservatives, have quite a lot in common in that the overall arching theme is that they are extremely misogynistic. They do not give a flying sh9t at all about the woman who is carrying the fetus.
Both sides are relentless in insisting that a fetus is completely a separate entity, entirely disengaged from the women who is carrying said fetus. Both sides do not give a shyte about the feelings, emotions, considerations, thinking, contemplating, mulling over that the woman would have to do who is carrying that fetus.
That’s right. Make no mistake. Both sides constantly try to hammer this message into the public’s collective skull. Extreme cons and extreme libs say that a fetus is one hundred percent a complete separate entity from the mother. This is even though biologically and medically, this is complete bullshyte.
And extreme libs say the exact same thing. The only difference in their opinion is the details. I will go into the details. Cons think that a fetus is completely disengaged from the mother. And libs think that a mother is completely disengaged from the fetus.
That's what libs say all the time, isn't it? A piece of trash, it’s a nonliving clump of dead cells, it’s nothing more than a tumor, it's a dirty disgusting little secret. Really, liberals? So a part of a woman’s body is a piece of trash? Something to throw away and pretend like it never existed? Something to casually toss out of one's mind?
What if she has bonded emotionally with it? What if she regards it as her child?
Extreme liberals like to champion themselves as defenders of women's rights. And they constantly lambast extreme right zealot Christian conservatives as being abusive and oppressive toward women. The latter part of which is true. But as for the former -- in reality liberals are every bit as misogynistic and violent as any conservatives that they denounce.
Neither side seems to realize that it is her body, therefore it is her decision. It is her body, she values it, she cherishes it, she treasures it. Therefore it is her right and her choice not to feel obligated to go through with this procedure just to appease some selfish unrealistic liberals.
It is just inconceivable to me that neither side is able to reconcile the fetus' existence with the mother. I mean, DUH. Nature intended it that way. The extreme right's ignorance of science is no excuse. The extreme left's ignorance of human emotion, feeling, and parent-child bonding is no excuse.
Whenever a conservative woman starts screeching, “A child is a gift from God! It is a blessed and sacred gift!” And then of course the liberals start knee-jerking, "oh she's a brainwashed weak wummin brainwashed by the evil religious menfolk."
I don’t think it's that simple. I think what is really going on is that the conservative is not great at articulating her thoughts. And twofold -- the libs suck at reading between the lines. What the conservative woman is really saying is,
"How dare you try to tell me that killing my child is supposed to empower me? Who the f- do you think you are? It's part of MY body, therefore don’t you dare tell me that cutting out dilation and curettage, scraping out a part of MY body is the right thing to do just because YOU say so."
I think that this is what is really going on here. Instinctively, it just feels wrong. Gut instinct. But they are not quite able to elucidate on specifically whhhyyy it feels wrong. They reach for the nearest explanation within their grasp. God said so. Which is fine. They made a well-founded equivalency between God's law and moral human law of instinct. It makes sense.
Looking back on it now, I now realize that this in fact revealed several things about the girls. They would be ready and willing to accept responsibility for their decisions and their actions. Because of this, they would most likely be better decision makers, they would weigh the pros and cons, the possible risks of making a major decision such as starting to sleep with someone. This is not an action they would take lightly or regard casually.
They have a hell of a lot more respect for their bodies than the typical liberal. They do not see or accept themselves as mere toilets for males' semen to be deposited, semen waste disposal systems.
They already knew about themselves that were they to discover that they were pregnant, they knew they would keep that child, and they would regard it as a child, a human being, and not just a lump of lifeless flesh to be discarded. This means that they know they would love their child, even if it did come about from a casual encounter.
As for the boys, I realize now that they only parroted out loud the notion that they are pro-abortion due to r-- to make it more palatable for people. For what sane human being___
But their internal motivations most likely did not concur with this at all. Far from it. Their real motivations were that if they accidentally got someone pregnant form casual sex, they could just throw some dollar bills at her the way you would with a stripper or a pros, and bark at her to go take care of it. What the hell would that mean, though? They don't want to be saddled with the responsibility of accepting the consequences of their decision, of their actions, order her to "go take care of it."
---------
Both sides, liberals and conservatives, have quite a lot in common in that the overall arching theme is that they are extremely misogynistic. They do not give a flying sh9t at all about the woman who is carrying the fetus.
Both sides are relentless in insisting that a fetus is completely a separate entity, entirely disengaged from the women who is carrying said fetus. Both sides do not give a shyte about the feelings, emotions, considerations, thinking, contemplating, mulling over that the woman would have to do who is carrying that fetus.
That’s right. Make no mistake. Both sides constantly try to hammer this message into the public’s collective skull. Extreme cons and extreme libs say that a fetus is one hundred percent a complete separate entity from the mother. This is even though biologically and medically, this is complete bullshyte.
And extreme libs say the exact same thing. The only difference in their opinion is the details. I will go into the details. Cons think that a fetus is completely disengaged from the mother. And libs think that a mother is completely disengaged from the fetus.
That's what libs say all the time, isn't it? A piece of trash, it’s a nonliving clump of dead cells, it’s nothing more than a tumor, it's a dirty disgusting little secret. Really, liberals? So a part of a woman’s body is a piece of trash? Something to throw away and pretend like it never existed? Something to casually toss out of one's mind?
What if she has bonded emotionally with it? What if she regards it as her child?
Extreme liberals like to champion themselves as defenders of women's rights. And they constantly lambast extreme right zealot Christian conservatives as being abusive and oppressive toward women. The latter part of which is true. But as for the former -- in reality liberals are every bit as misogynistic and violent as any conservatives that they denounce.
Neither side seems to realize that it is her body, therefore it is her decision. It is her body, she values it, she cherishes it, she treasures it. Therefore it is her right and her choice not to feel obligated to go through with this procedure just to appease some selfish unrealistic liberals.
It is just inconceivable to me that neither side is able to reconcile the fetus' existence with the mother. I mean, DUH. Nature intended it that way. The extreme right's ignorance of science is no excuse. The extreme left's ignorance of human emotion, feeling, and parent-child bonding is no excuse.
Whenever a conservative woman starts screeching, “A child is a gift from God! It is a blessed and sacred gift!” And then of course the liberals start knee-jerking, "oh she's a brainwashed weak wummin brainwashed by the evil religious menfolk."
I don’t think it's that simple. I think what is really going on is that the conservative is not great at articulating her thoughts. And twofold -- the libs suck at reading between the lines. What the conservative woman is really saying is,
"How dare you try to tell me that killing my child is supposed to empower me? Who the f- do you think you are? It's part of MY body, therefore don’t you dare tell me that cutting out dilation and curettage, scraping out a part of MY body is the right thing to do just because YOU say so."
I think that this is what is really going on here. Instinctively, it just feels wrong. Gut instinct. But they are not quite able to elucidate on specifically whhhyyy it feels wrong. They reach for the nearest explanation within their grasp. God said so. Which is fine. They made a well-founded equivalency between God's law and moral human law of instinct. It makes sense.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment