Monday, July 14, 2008

My average is better than your average

Ahhh.  Finally the complete, detailed, unfiltered truth comes out.
At long last, science has confirmed what I, and most people, have always suspected to be the truth.

(((((On the subject of Asians having higher IQs than whites, and whites having higher IQs than blacks.)))  Ahh.  That's more like it.  I breathe a sigh of relief.  At long last, they are giving us the __ detailed, *whole* truth.  I settle back in smug, comfortable victory.

__Full, whole, unabridged, unedited truth

(((((*I had been first introduced to the idea of races expressing IQ DIFFERENCES back when I was in high school.  I was vehemently against this idea
((((Since part of it was not true, I dismissed all of it as being false.))))  Because that great big detail was quite obviously untrue, I dismissed all of it as utter hogwash.
((((Now that I am older and wiser))))
IQ editings(for when ahh the truth finally is uncovered, has cast off its shroud ((((blanket)))
Back then,,They lumped all minorities together into one broad spectrum___
Jumbled them all toge into a into one lump sum

I am ok wi it because these scores consistently reveal Asians coming out on top.  Mathematics scores, verbal skills, SATS, national scholar scores, innate ability, IQ tests, everything.

The reason I was so adamantly against this when I was in my youth was that the general media reports made no distinctions whatsoever between the non-white races.  The mass media divided the entire human race into only two categories --- white and other.

But now more recently, the mass media has finally twigged onto the fact that not all minority races are created equal.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Bleeding-Heart Conservatives?

I do not understand why the recent conservative rhetoric as of late is trying to maintain that conservatives in the general populace are the "average man," "Joe plumber," et cetera et cetera.  Why have conservatives now assumed the personae of everyday commoners?

And they are insisting that liberals are elitist, conceited, privileged, and stuff.

This does not gel at all with the sociopolitical dynamic we have seen in years of yore.  In the past it has always been liberals that were average, that rallied against the snooty stuck-up elite.  They did not like rich people, they did not like corporate embezzlers, they did not like tax breaks for the wealthy.  And if you go further back in history, liberals did not like educated people, or privileged people, or business owners, or plantation owners, or land owners, or government office holders.  And certainly not slave-owners, but I do agree with them on that one.

Aren't conservatives the rich corporate execs?  Conservatives have always been the privileged rich white people that have connections, that easily get accepted into the Ivy League because Mother and Daddy are rich.

Conservatives are the ones with the connections; that is their historic impression with   They can effortlessly slip into business, into government, comfortably coasting right out of their ivory towers of higher education on their parents' coattails, ad ilk.  "The stupid sons of rich men."  Quote by Charles Eliot, president emeritus of Harvard University.

Liberals aren't elitists.  Conservatives are.  Liberals are the dregs of society.  They have a couple of diseases, a couple of unwanted out-of-wedlock pregnancies, they have crack babies.  They have rap sheets the length of the human genome project, and woefully subpar literacy rates.  They are always poor and downtrodden.  They are the throwaway people.

And they keep making more of themselves, unchecked, so it does not matter if we lose a couple three.  Liberals supposedly always work for the poor, the tired, the hungry, the huddled masses, always rooting for the underdog.  And this part is hilarious -- they have horrible hygiene.  I am seriously not making that up; it's been documented.

Liberals are usually average, but they don't seem to realize it because their self-esteem is falsely inflated.  This is what the American Idol judges have been trying to drive home.  All these untalented hacks are constantly being told by society, being told by by their butt-kissing sycophantic friends, by liberals, that you can do it!  If you really want something bad enough, you can have it!  It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game!  It doesn't matter if you failed and if you did not get the desired results, what matters is that you tried your best!  Even if you didn't actually try your best!  What matters is that you *wanted* the success!  With lots of exclamation points!

Forty years of social promotion has had the unforeseen consequence of convincing a couple generations of people that they are extraordinary, ferociously intelligent, supermen and superwomen, talented beyond their wildest imaginations.

And that if they really put their minds to it, they can accomplish anything.  This has been the ongoing modus operandi in public grade schools, in the workforce, in college admissions practices, in community organizations such as youth athletics, art contests.

That is the biggest reason I don't get why Sarah Palin is the poster child for good ol' fashioned down home values of being a doofus and thinking that heart and character (ehhhh ehhhhh screeching sound) qualify her for running for president.  These self-described conservatives seem to be embracing liberal conceits of being an idiot and being proud of it.

Elitism?  Education?  Social status?  Why are these now suddenly being maligned as liberal ideals?  These are conservative precepts.

And now conservatives are trying to paint themselves as some sort of savior for the people?  Where did this strange reversal of dynamic suddenly emerge from?