This is in response to the sad case for sociobiology that has flooded the airwaves.
Security and stability, consistency in romantic relationships is an evolutionary requirement that women desire. And supposedly, men desire the opposite. Men supposedly do not care for stability and structure in personal romantic relationships. The evolution has decreed that men are supersluts by design. That is the theory.
People are still insisting that males' role is somehow automatically better than females' role. All these women are saying they are "infuriated" or "offended" or whatever at the hypothesis.
This is a reactionary, knee-jerk response to the quandary. So in essence, these uninformed non-feminists are still** being incredibly sexist. Because they are assuming that the male's role is better than a female's role. And so, bitter and resentful, they have decided to use drag themselves down into the gutter and insist that this is equality. All they are doing essentially is exacting revenge. That's it.
I think the real problem with this theory is that [[___women are being objectified, same as they have been all throughout pop culture history. With this woefully ignorant, uninformed theory, women are seen as mere toys for males to play with. Women are portrayed as sex objects and nothing else. This pseudo-evolutionary theory is incredibly lacking, this is incomplete in its information.
They should instead be lifting all people up to a higher plane of understanding. They should instead have a more intelligent and comprehensive interpretation of how human beings regard each other.
Males and females, heed my words. If you are going to have sex with random people, then fine, whatever. But do not say that evolution made you do it. If you are going to do that, that is your own personal choice. Don't point to evolution as the driving force. Saying that your sexual habits are due to evolution is basically saying that you have no choice in the matter. This is essentially saying that you have no free will.
That is in direct conflict and violation of evolution, and here is why. Lower less-evolved animals have no conscious free will. They are guided by only instinct. Homo sapiens, however, are supposed to be several steps higher in existence. We are supposed to be a radical departure and improvement over lower members of Kingdom Animalia. We have evolved the conscious ability to make choices and control our behavior.
I was taught that "evolution" is supposed to mean an improvement over past species, improvement over past decisions and actions, improvement over transgressions that caused harm to people. We humans have conscious choice and free will, do we not? We have the capacity for logical, rational thought. We are are able to utilize level-headed, reasonable decision-making and critical thinking.
Unfortunately, the herd female response has only made the situation worse. These twin aggravations of sociobiology and herd-females have both convened to create a disgusting, sad, sagging, pathetic social dynamic. They exacerbate each other further and further down the sewer.
Too many women are screeching and screaming that they are offended by the notion that women desire safety and security? Ah, excuse me? Why would anyone be offended by this?
Somewhere in the abstract labyrinthine pedagogues of their minds, do they think safety and security are bad things? Do they interpret it as somehow being "demeaning" to posit the notion that women value safety and security?
What about safety and security from crime? Is that also a "bad" thing? __ poverty? "" """" As I am a woman, I can tell you in no uncertain terms that, yes absolutely OF COURSE safety and security are important to me. That is why I went to college; that is why I majored in something useful; that is why I got a job.
As a woman, I can tell you in no uncertain terms that I most definitely, absolutely want safety and security for my life. Which is why I went to college. Got a job. Majored in something useful that will bring me job security, monetary security, personal security.
Conservatives: I have a question for you. Why, when someone says that women desire safety and security in life, do you automatically assume this means she wants a man to protect and provide for her? Everywhere I see and read, this is astonishing in its monotony. This is the only interpretation I see any time and any place that so-called evolutionary differences between men and women is mentioned.
Why do you not come to the realization that if a women desires security, she might seek it out for herself? If a woman desires stability, security, and safety in her life, she has a capability and the means to obtain it without needing a man to do it for her. She can work hard, get an education, get a well-paying professional, decent, respectable job.
Liberals: Same question. You heard me. Why, when someone says that women desire safety and security in life, do you liberals automatically assume this means she wants a man to protect and provide for her?
I do not understand why people are lauding the supposed male drive to be whorish, and lambasting the female drive to be monogamous. Why is it a good thing that males are sluts?
Can someone explain this to me? Seriously, why in the world are so many females offended by this postulate?
We are not baboons or wildebeests or mammoths or whatever roaming the jungles. We are human beings, a higher animal. We are evolved, meaning we are better than that.
As human beings, we must build society to be clean and well-organized and safe. We know that this is all required in order to have a productive, intelligent society that progresses forward. As a matter of fact, we not only "know" in our minds through logic and reasoning that this is a good idea, but we in fact crave and desire it. We want a society that is stable and structured and orderly. We want as little crime as possible. We want excellent education. We want decent, reliable, available job opportunities with reasonable salaries.
In our Homo sapiens arsenal of sentience, we possess self-awareness, we have full consciousness. We perceive that the universe exists, and we perceive ourselves in the world and in the universe. We have the mental capability to ponder our existence. We can consider the meaning of the universe, and we have the intelligence capability to seek and carve out an existence that fits in well in society.
Be proud of your own evolutionary requirement. You have morphed to desire and seek this. This is a good thing. This is something to which people *should* aspire. This keeps society safe, keeps society whole, keeps society healthy. Women should be praised and exalted, and held aloft on the prodigal altar. I do not understand why women are throwing screeching temper tantrums over the notion that females want security and stability.
Security and stability, consistency in romantic relationships is an evolutionary requirement that women desire. And supposedly, men desire the opposite. Men supposedly do not care for stability and structure in personal romantic relationships. The evolution has decreed that men are supersluts by design. That is the theory.
People are still insisting that males' role is somehow automatically better than females' role. All these women are saying they are "infuriated" or "offended" or whatever at the hypothesis.
This is a reactionary, knee-jerk response to the quandary. So in essence, these uninformed non-feminists are still** being incredibly sexist. Because they are assuming that the male's role is better than a female's role. And so, bitter and resentful, they have decided to use drag themselves down into the gutter and insist that this is equality. All they are doing essentially is exacting revenge. That's it.
I think the real problem with this theory is that [[___women are being objectified, same as they have been all throughout pop culture history. With this woefully ignorant, uninformed theory, women are seen as mere toys for males to play with. Women are portrayed as sex objects and nothing else. This pseudo-evolutionary theory is incredibly lacking, this is incomplete in its information.
They should instead be lifting all people up to a higher plane of understanding. They should instead have a more intelligent and comprehensive interpretation of how human beings regard each other.
Males and females, heed my words. If you are going to have sex with random people, then fine, whatever. But do not say that evolution made you do it. If you are going to do that, that is your own personal choice. Don't point to evolution as the driving force. Saying that your sexual habits are due to evolution is basically saying that you have no choice in the matter. This is essentially saying that you have no free will.
That is in direct conflict and violation of evolution, and here is why. Lower less-evolved animals have no conscious free will. They are guided by only instinct. Homo sapiens, however, are supposed to be several steps higher in existence. We are supposed to be a radical departure and improvement over lower members of Kingdom Animalia. We have evolved the conscious ability to make choices and control our behavior.
I was taught that "evolution" is supposed to mean an improvement over past species, improvement over past decisions and actions, improvement over transgressions that caused harm to people. We humans have conscious choice and free will, do we not? We have the capacity for logical, rational thought. We are are able to utilize level-headed, reasonable decision-making and critical thinking.
Unfortunately, the herd female response has only made the situation worse. These twin aggravations of sociobiology and herd-females have both convened to create a disgusting, sad, sagging, pathetic social dynamic. They exacerbate each other further and further down the sewer.
Too many women are screeching and screaming that they are offended by the notion that women desire safety and security? Ah, excuse me? Why would anyone be offended by this?
Somewhere in the abstract labyrinthine pedagogues of their minds, do they think safety and security are bad things? Do they interpret it as somehow being "demeaning" to posit the notion that women value safety and security?
What about safety and security from crime? Is that also a "bad" thing? __ poverty? "" """" As I am a woman, I can tell you in no uncertain terms that, yes absolutely OF COURSE safety and security are important to me. That is why I went to college; that is why I majored in something useful; that is why I got a job.
As a woman, I can tell you in no uncertain terms that I most definitely, absolutely want safety and security for my life. Which is why I went to college. Got a job. Majored in something useful that will bring me job security, monetary security, personal security.
Conservatives: I have a question for you. Why, when someone says that women desire safety and security in life, do you automatically assume this means she wants a man to protect and provide for her? Everywhere I see and read, this is astonishing in its monotony. This is the only interpretation I see any time and any place that so-called evolutionary differences between men and women is mentioned.
Why do you not come to the realization that if a women desires security, she might seek it out for herself? If a woman desires stability, security, and safety in her life, she has a capability and the means to obtain it without needing a man to do it for her. She can work hard, get an education, get a well-paying professional, decent, respectable job.
Liberals: Same question. You heard me. Why, when someone says that women desire safety and security in life, do you liberals automatically assume this means she wants a man to protect and provide for her?
I do not understand why people are lauding the supposed male drive to be whorish, and lambasting the female drive to be monogamous. Why is it a good thing that males are sluts?
Can someone explain this to me? Seriously, why in the world are so many females offended by this postulate?
We are not baboons or wildebeests or mammoths or whatever roaming the jungles. We are human beings, a higher animal. We are evolved, meaning we are better than that.
As human beings, we must build society to be clean and well-organized and safe. We know that this is all required in order to have a productive, intelligent society that progresses forward. As a matter of fact, we not only "know" in our minds through logic and reasoning that this is a good idea, but we in fact crave and desire it. We want a society that is stable and structured and orderly. We want as little crime as possible. We want excellent education. We want decent, reliable, available job opportunities with reasonable salaries.
In our Homo sapiens arsenal of sentience, we possess self-awareness, we have full consciousness. We perceive that the universe exists, and we perceive ourselves in the world and in the universe. We have the mental capability to ponder our existence. We can consider the meaning of the universe, and we have the intelligence capability to seek and carve out an existence that fits in well in society.
Be proud of your own evolutionary requirement. You have morphed to desire and seek this. This is a good thing. This is something to which people *should* aspire. This keeps society safe, keeps society whole, keeps society healthy. Women should be praised and exalted, and held aloft on the prodigal altar. I do not understand why women are throwing screeching temper tantrums over the notion that females want security and stability.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment