What is this whole thing we have in this society that wanting to be a success is somehow automatically evil?
As in, it is somehow evilly conservative and government-corrupt or something, a ridiculous argument like that. We hear the terms “soapbox,” “morally high ground,” or any of the ridiculous arguments that lazy slacker types use as an excuse for the fact that they simply do not have any goals for themselves. More importantly, they are unable to reach any goals.
What’s wrong with wanting to be the best in your chosen field? What's wrong with aiming(shooting) [[[[squaring it in your crosshairs]]]]] to be the best you can be,
What’s wrong with competition, and with competing with others for a reward? Or more importantly, how about competing for the distinction that you have genuine, honest-to-goodness talent, that you have the most talent in the whole group, and that you are the best?
What’s wrong with showcasing honest, respectable talent that is actually useful to society? What is wrong with demonstrating that this can be applied towards doing something good for the world, improving the world's condition, acting on a local level and doing good for your community? And proving that you can diligently work very hard to achieve your goals. ***perhaps use part of my sense of accomplishment, sense of belonging essay. -the good parts.**
What’s wrong with settings goals for yourself? Yes, big goals, grandiose goals, (high standards), and wanting to be a success.
(include huge 'tirade', well not really tirade, more like inspirational lecture and discussion the way all my essays are.)
(((what is the true definition of success -- explain)))
Same ess as "accomp do not define a person"
Or "success has nothing to do with you as a person""
Uh?, actually it kind of does. // agn it has very little to do with money. Eg, a very moneyed drug dealer makes more money than a poor drug dealer. Does that make him more "successful"? No, he's a goddamn drug dealer.
Let us refer again to the example of teachers. ___If a teacher gives very clear, well-thought out explanations, provides excellent detailed well-organized notes, and is able to convey complex ideas to her students [[[very well; so that they understand)), then that is a successful professional.
As in, it is somehow evilly conservative and government-corrupt or something, a ridiculous argument like that. We hear the terms “soapbox,” “morally high ground,” or any of the ridiculous arguments that lazy slacker types use as an excuse for the fact that they simply do not have any goals for themselves. More importantly, they are unable to reach any goals.
What’s wrong with wanting to be the best in your chosen field? What's wrong with aiming(shooting) [[[[squaring it in your crosshairs]]]]] to be the best you can be,
What’s wrong with competition, and with competing with others for a reward? Or more importantly, how about competing for the distinction that you have genuine, honest-to-goodness talent, that you have the most talent in the whole group, and that you are the best?
What’s wrong with showcasing honest, respectable talent that is actually useful to society? What is wrong with demonstrating that this can be applied towards doing something good for the world, improving the world's condition, acting on a local level and doing good for your community? And proving that you can diligently work very hard to achieve your goals. ***perhaps use part of my sense of accomplishment, sense of belonging essay. -the good parts.**
What’s wrong with settings goals for yourself? Yes, big goals, grandiose goals, (high standards), and wanting to be a success.
(include huge 'tirade', well not really tirade, more like inspirational lecture and discussion the way all my essays are.)
(((what is the true definition of success -- explain)))
Same ess as "accomp do not define a person"
Or "success has nothing to do with you as a person""
Uh?, actually it kind of does. // agn it has very little to do with money. Eg, a very moneyed drug dealer makes more money than a poor drug dealer. Does that make him more "successful"? No, he's a goddamn drug dealer.
Let us refer again to the example of teachers. ___If a teacher gives very clear, well-thought out explanations, provides excellent detailed well-organized notes, and is able to convey complex ideas to her students [[[very well; so that they understand)), then that is a successful professional.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment