00the abortion pill has now been invented, and this is a good thing. This is why the abortion pill is a good thing. This way, if someone feels the need to get an abortion, they can terminate the pregnancy when it is basically nothing more than a zygote, a blastula. At this stage in its biological development, it is not a human being yet.
There was a married couple featured in the article, who decided to abort the second pregnancy. They looked at what they are capable of handling, __ and they weighted the situation, the pros and cons, and they arrived at a logical reasonable conclusion based on the facts. This is a good thing that they did this.
I have said if before, and I will say it again. Reproductive capability alone does not determine evolution. They used logic and reasoning, and they thought ahead and followed the potential situation to its logical conclusions. Using deductive reasoning, they determined what the likely possible outcome would be in the future.
In this case, this is not much more morally reprehensible than taking a very strong antibiotic medicine. There are medicines to get rid of parasites such as ringworm. The abortion pill delivers a similar [[[purpose,__ swift blow._ efficient purpose.]]]
Because yeah, if someone gets an abortion __ and the pregnancy is pretty far along, I will admit that gives me the heebie jeebies. If the fetus already starts to resemble an actual live baby, that is quite creepy to get an abortion at that stage. If the woman is lazy enough to let it fester to the point in time at which she starts to show the live viable pregnancy, that is pretty disgusting. At that point it is too far along to casually pretend they're not screwed. But if they can nip it in the bud, they should take advantage of the resources.
Also, we must address the sickening, uncomfortable topic of when abortion is unfortunately a necessity. Like it or not, real horrors do exist and do take place every single day. r--d, child molestation. Yes, I am aware that those are very similar crimes, almost essentially the same thing. But child abuse is such a sick nasty vile crime that it warrants classification as a separate crime. Law enforcement agrees with me.
But I have to admit, some of the protests in favor of abortion are comical, ludicrous. Such as how many pro-choice advocates say, "abortion should be legal but it should not be used as a form of birth control." Err, huh? That is kind of exactly what abortion is used for-- as a form of birth control. That is the point and purpose of the whole thing. Look, pro-abortion advocates, don't sit there and say you are pro-abortion but then object to some of them reasons that people get abortions. Either be pro-abortion all the way like you say you are, or admit that you have moral qualms to it.
Or when self-described liberals claim they are pro-choice but they also say it is their lifelong dream to reduce the number of abortions. Like in national statistics, they dream that one day the people will have fewer abortions. Well, if abortions are so damn great and liberating and empowering and they are "my right as a woman," then why is it ever a bad thing? If abortions are supported by "strong women," then why would you ever want to decrease the numbers?
I will admit that I lose respect for someone if I find out they had an abortion voluntarily and it was not because they were rdd. Cher had a couple three of abortions, I think. Nasty. Gloria Steinen, who is arguably one of the world's most famous feminists, is the one that I happen to like the least. She had an abortion. She is quoted as having said, "I could either give birth to someone else, or I could give birth to myself." And then she was spurred on her quest to become a feminist. Now, I take issue with her statement. She thinks her child that she is carrying is "someone else?" So she regards her potential kid as a complete stranger, a weird creature entity that has nothing to do with herself.
This is pretty creepy. But she probably did the right thing getting an abortion. She has pretty much admitted that she did not want to have a kid. Carrying the fetus to term would not be beneficial for anyone. Not for G. Steinem, who doesn't want it. Certainly not for the kid. The kid would likely just be dropped off at a foster home only to be doomed to a life of bleakness and depression and poverty. Better to just nip it in the bud when it is not a human yet.
There was a married couple featured in the article, who decided to abort the second pregnancy. They looked at what they are capable of handling, __ and they weighted the situation, the pros and cons, and they arrived at a logical reasonable conclusion based on the facts. This is a good thing that they did this.
I have said if before, and I will say it again. Reproductive capability alone does not determine evolution. They used logic and reasoning, and they thought ahead and followed the potential situation to its logical conclusions. Using deductive reasoning, they determined what the likely possible outcome would be in the future.
In this case, this is not much more morally reprehensible than taking a very strong antibiotic medicine. There are medicines to get rid of parasites such as ringworm. The abortion pill delivers a similar [[[purpose,__ swift blow._ efficient purpose.]]]
Because yeah, if someone gets an abortion __ and the pregnancy is pretty far along, I will admit that gives me the heebie jeebies. If the fetus already starts to resemble an actual live baby, that is quite creepy to get an abortion at that stage. If the woman is lazy enough to let it fester to the point in time at which she starts to show the live viable pregnancy, that is pretty disgusting. At that point it is too far along to casually pretend they're not screwed. But if they can nip it in the bud, they should take advantage of the resources.
Also, we must address the sickening, uncomfortable topic of when abortion is unfortunately a necessity. Like it or not, real horrors do exist and do take place every single day. r--d, child molestation. Yes, I am aware that those are very similar crimes, almost essentially the same thing. But child abuse is such a sick nasty vile crime that it warrants classification as a separate crime. Law enforcement agrees with me.
But I have to admit, some of the protests in favor of abortion are comical, ludicrous. Such as how many pro-choice advocates say, "abortion should be legal but it should not be used as a form of birth control." Err, huh? That is kind of exactly what abortion is used for-- as a form of birth control. That is the point and purpose of the whole thing. Look, pro-abortion advocates, don't sit there and say you are pro-abortion but then object to some of them reasons that people get abortions. Either be pro-abortion all the way like you say you are, or admit that you have moral qualms to it.
Or when self-described liberals claim they are pro-choice but they also say it is their lifelong dream to reduce the number of abortions. Like in national statistics, they dream that one day the people will have fewer abortions. Well, if abortions are so damn great and liberating and empowering and they are "my right as a woman," then why is it ever a bad thing? If abortions are supported by "strong women," then why would you ever want to decrease the numbers?
I will admit that I lose respect for someone if I find out they had an abortion voluntarily and it was not because they were rdd. Cher had a couple three of abortions, I think. Nasty. Gloria Steinen, who is arguably one of the world's most famous feminists, is the one that I happen to like the least. She had an abortion. She is quoted as having said, "I could either give birth to someone else, or I could give birth to myself." And then she was spurred on her quest to become a feminist. Now, I take issue with her statement. She thinks her child that she is carrying is "someone else?" So she regards her potential kid as a complete stranger, a weird creature entity that has nothing to do with herself.
This is pretty creepy. But she probably did the right thing getting an abortion. She has pretty much admitted that she did not want to have a kid. Carrying the fetus to term would not be beneficial for anyone. Not for G. Steinem, who doesn't want it. Certainly not for the kid. The kid would likely just be dropped off at a foster home only to be doomed to a life of bleakness and depression and poverty. Better to just nip it in the bud when it is not a human yet.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment