Some idiot was saying it would be a positive change if the world were more accepting of girls to express their sexuality.
Hmmm, yes, fascinating, fascinating. Perhaps someday we can envision an alternate universe in which women are allowed to express their dignity, class, and self-respect. An alternate universe in which women are allowed to have some morals and standards and are not dismissed as being politically incorrect for it. A universe in which women are not judged by their sexual habits. A universe in which women are not judged as being backwards/old-fashioned/repressed/etc. just because they don't allow anything with two-and-a-quarter legs to mount them. A universe in which women acknowledge the fact that sexuality is a private, personal matter that should deserve a bit of respect if women want to keep some of it to themselves.
Perhaps we can imagine a universe in which women finally snap awake and realize, hey, this is a personal matter -- it is nobody else's damn business.
Geez, it's like people have never heard of Gloria Allred or something. What the hell have old-school feminists been fighting for all these years? I thought we have been working hard to gain equal treatment, respect, and acknowledgment as able minds. This is in the professional workforce, in the political arena, in all fields of scholarly achievement.
What was the point if now these so-called neo "feminists" are breaking it all down by sheer doublespeak, gullibility, and ignorance? (I really resent their being allowed to use this vocabulary term, because I really feel that it does not apply to them.) How the hell can us feminists expect to be taken seriously as university professors and conductors of biomedical research and court judges if we still have to climb against this crap?
You probably think you are better than women that choose not to sleep around and who do judge people that do sleep around. (For the record, those of us who judge, we judge both men and women, we are not sexist as in judging only women).
You are exactly the same as neo-conservatives who judge women based on their sexuality. Cons think a woman who sleeps around is not worth wasting breath on. And you are exactly the same. You think a woman who chooses NOT to sleep around is not worth wasting breath on. How are you any better than extremist ultra-conservatives that force women to wear prairie dresses and/or burkas?
How the hell are you any better? You are _still_ seeing women as sex objects and judging them based on what their output of sex is. That is none of the conservatives' business. But guess what -- it is none of your damn business either.
Look, you can lie to the teeming festering males that egg you on and grope for more and more. You can lie to the morasses of other females that have fallen for this crap. You can even lie to yourself.
But you don't get to lie to us. We women are the old-school feminists, who have the ethos and the pathos. We have the innate authority and intelligence grown from years of studying psychology, history, and current events.
And yes, make no mistake -- you do have an attitude of forcing women into it. We can tell by your own account because your reaction was that of fury. Not a reaction of mild disappointment, not of annoyance, not even, "oh well, that's her opinion but I'll just keep doing my thing because I am perfectly satisfied being a sinner and a w---," -- but full-on fury. That is perplexing and exasperating. I have made the suggestion that perhaps girls should have the option to show some spine, stand up for themselves, and demand more from society and from themselves --- and your reaction is to be infuriated?? I just don't get it.
You call that more "freedom?" It is not. Forcing people into more of that brand of so-called "freedom" is as bad as oppression. Worse-- it is abuse.
Because if they are oppressed, i.e., prevented from exercising freedom, e.g., drugs and promiscuity, then they might be grumbling about it. But let's be honest here, they are still better off for it. They might be a little ticked off, but their emotional and physical health are all still intact. On the flip side, if someone is forced into more "freedom" (loose behavior, etc.), we have a word for that: r-p-. Forcing "freedom" on people is the same thing as tyranny.
Hmmm, yes, fascinating, fascinating. Perhaps someday we can envision an alternate universe in which women are allowed to express their dignity, class, and self-respect. An alternate universe in which women are allowed to have some morals and standards and are not dismissed as being politically incorrect for it. A universe in which women are not judged by their sexual habits. A universe in which women are not judged as being backwards/old-fashioned/repressed/etc. just because they don't allow anything with two-and-a-quarter legs to mount them. A universe in which women acknowledge the fact that sexuality is a private, personal matter that should deserve a bit of respect if women want to keep some of it to themselves.
Perhaps we can imagine a universe in which women finally snap awake and realize, hey, this is a personal matter -- it is nobody else's damn business.
Geez, it's like people have never heard of Gloria Allred or something. What the hell have old-school feminists been fighting for all these years? I thought we have been working hard to gain equal treatment, respect, and acknowledgment as able minds. This is in the professional workforce, in the political arena, in all fields of scholarly achievement.
What was the point if now these so-called neo "feminists" are breaking it all down by sheer doublespeak, gullibility, and ignorance? (I really resent their being allowed to use this vocabulary term, because I really feel that it does not apply to them.) How the hell can us feminists expect to be taken seriously as university professors and conductors of biomedical research and court judges if we still have to climb against this crap?
You probably think you are better than women that choose not to sleep around and who do judge people that do sleep around. (For the record, those of us who judge, we judge both men and women, we are not sexist as in judging only women).
You are exactly the same as neo-conservatives who judge women based on their sexuality. Cons think a woman who sleeps around is not worth wasting breath on. And you are exactly the same. You think a woman who chooses NOT to sleep around is not worth wasting breath on. How are you any better than extremist ultra-conservatives that force women to wear prairie dresses and/or burkas?
How the hell are you any better? You are _still_ seeing women as sex objects and judging them based on what their output of sex is. That is none of the conservatives' business. But guess what -- it is none of your damn business either.
Look, you can lie to the teeming festering males that egg you on and grope for more and more. You can lie to the morasses of other females that have fallen for this crap. You can even lie to yourself.
But you don't get to lie to us. We women are the old-school feminists, who have the ethos and the pathos. We have the innate authority and intelligence grown from years of studying psychology, history, and current events.
And yes, make no mistake -- you do have an attitude of forcing women into it. We can tell by your own account because your reaction was that of fury. Not a reaction of mild disappointment, not of annoyance, not even, "oh well, that's her opinion but I'll just keep doing my thing because I am perfectly satisfied being a sinner and a w---," -- but full-on fury. That is perplexing and exasperating. I have made the suggestion that perhaps girls should have the option to show some spine, stand up for themselves, and demand more from society and from themselves --- and your reaction is to be infuriated?? I just don't get it.
You call that more "freedom?" It is not. Forcing people into more of that brand of so-called "freedom" is as bad as oppression. Worse-- it is abuse.
Because if they are oppressed, i.e., prevented from exercising freedom, e.g., drugs and promiscuity, then they might be grumbling about it. But let's be honest here, they are still better off for it. They might be a little ticked off, but their emotional and physical health are all still intact. On the flip side, if someone is forced into more "freedom" (loose behavior, etc.), we have a word for that: r-p-. Forcing "freedom" on people is the same thing as tyranny.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment