Atheists respect women more than Christians do because rightwing Christians see women as inferior to men -- and atheists don't do that? Wrong.
**the imporat salient point that,___ hmm how to word it ecpress itttt...^^
Like, theat beause they di nottt value woimen as wives snd mothers, this automaticaly means thay must_____
**inspiration, revel , epigph
---- lubsrals are rational, logical, scientific thinking? nope. they pimp out the notion at soceity that women promsicuit is somwhow bettetr than having self-respect. ((would intersect wi hot ckicks slef-esteem crsp./\/\/\
///--- the creepy fdisgusting nerds with thier vieeo games and their dunguins and dragons wherein thy rpp hot women.^^
-= havew been used to seell random crap. gadgets,ann shtt, they try to attact the cusomtea with their degraaind, tearing down of womwen.
They core out a hole from family and religion. They stick technology into that hole, and they simply assumed that this would take over and would inject its own morality, respect, dignity. as it turns out, that was not what happened at all.
So this is how it is without your reviled, notorious easy target of religion. Society disintegrates into this 3h +. Society degenerates into this mess. Sad, flaccid, sagging, sokaed, limp, ragged, soppy, dishrags and dirty dishwater of broken dreams.
They claim that Christians think of women as property to own because of marriage.
Oh, and you think your approach of women being property to <rent> is so much better? That's right. You so-called freethinking rebels are not distinguished from extremist Christians on the grand scheme of things, in many discernible ways.
The hookup culture, the stt culture, the living together. And let's not forget the notorious nadir granddaddy of all, prso. That is the ultimate low point of seeing women as property to rent. A disturbing number of "freethinker" atheists are in favor of rpos, pr0n, stripping, and the ilk.
**the imporat salient point that,___ hmm how to word it ecpress itttt...^^
Like, theat beause they di nottt value woimen as wives snd mothers, this automaticaly means thay must_____
**inspiration, revel , epigph
---- lubsrals are rational, logical, scientific thinking? nope. they pimp out the notion at soceity that women promsicuit is somwhow bettetr than having self-respect. ((would intersect wi hot ckicks slef-esteem crsp./\/\/\
///--- the creepy fdisgusting nerds with thier vieeo games and their dunguins and dragons wherein thy rpp hot women.^^
-= havew been used to seell random crap. gadgets,ann shtt, they try to attact the cusomtea with their degraaind, tearing down of womwen.
They core out a hole from family and religion. They stick technology into that hole, and they simply assumed that this would take over and would inject its own morality, respect, dignity. as it turns out, that was not what happened at all.
So this is how it is without your reviled, notorious easy target of religion. Society disintegrates into this 3h +. Society degenerates into this mess. Sad, flaccid, sagging, sokaed, limp, ragged, soppy, dishrags and dirty dishwater of broken dreams.
They claim that Christians think of women as property to own because of marriage.
Oh, and you think your approach of women being property to <rent> is so much better? That's right. You so-called freethinking rebels are not distinguished from extremist Christians on the grand scheme of things, in many discernible ways.
The hookup culture, the stt culture, the living together. And let's not forget the notorious nadir granddaddy of all, prso. That is the ultimate low point of seeing women as property to rent. A disturbing number of "freethinker" atheists are in favor of rpos, pr0n, stripping, and the ilk.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment