Even without having to fall back on the old standby of a deity, atheists still manage to be misogynistic as all get out.
It's just that they no longer have a God delusion to fall back on anymore, so they have to find another delusion. Similar to how extremist religious fundamentalists/zealots make the claim that a female's body is not her own; it belongs to the dude that wants to make her his child bride, or it belongs to G-d, or to a fetus.
In a similar fashion, pseudo-evolutionists wish to make the claim that a female's body is not her own. It belongs to whomever else due to whatever reason, whether evolution, reproduction, the selfish gene, et cetera.
If you are such great damn scientists and biology-based ethicists, then you must realize there is no reason to end biological arguments there. Hell, if we're going to make so-called biological arguments, there are a lot of other potential biology-based regulations we can implement.
A girl at around age twelve develops the ability to dispense an ovum once every month from her ovaries. She develops the ability to house and carry a fetus to term.
A boy at around age twelve develops the ability to produce sperm from his body. Since we are making biological arguments here, after all, it only makes sense that__
Biologically and sexually, these two twelve-year olds are adults. They fully possess the capability to produce and grow an entire new human being.
What's that you say? That we are higher beings with the capacity for reason? For logic, for levelheadedness, for having the ability to judge a situation, weigh the pros and cons, and determine the optimal outcome that will give the best possible results?
Self-touted atheists seem to think that they alone possess the patent on the capability to utilize logic. Anyone who disagrees with them must by default be "illogical." Notice that they seem to think the ability to pronounce "evolution" correctly alone qualifies them to wear a gold star bearing the label "science-y." Many of them do not have a remarkable wealth of scientific knowledge outside the very narrow topic of evolution.
How about empathy, compassion, respect, care and concern for your fellow human beings? What about conducting oneself with self-respect and dignity? So-called logic-driven, scientifical, evolution-thumpers always seem to skip this very large faction of human cognitive function. Their brand of logic is, not surprisingly, a lot of bs.
It's just that they no longer have a God delusion to fall back on anymore, so they have to find another delusion. Similar to how extremist religious fundamentalists/zealots make the claim that a female's body is not her own; it belongs to the dude that wants to make her his child bride, or it belongs to G-d, or to a fetus.
In a similar fashion, pseudo-evolutionists wish to make the claim that a female's body is not her own. It belongs to whomever else due to whatever reason, whether evolution, reproduction, the selfish gene, et cetera.
If you are such great damn scientists and biology-based ethicists, then you must realize there is no reason to end biological arguments there. Hell, if we're going to make so-called biological arguments, there are a lot of other potential biology-based regulations we can implement.
A girl at around age twelve develops the ability to dispense an ovum once every month from her ovaries. She develops the ability to house and carry a fetus to term.
A boy at around age twelve develops the ability to produce sperm from his body. Since we are making biological arguments here, after all, it only makes sense that__
Biologically and sexually, these two twelve-year olds are adults. They fully possess the capability to produce and grow an entire new human being.
What's that you say? That we are higher beings with the capacity for reason? For logic, for levelheadedness, for having the ability to judge a situation, weigh the pros and cons, and determine the optimal outcome that will give the best possible results?
Self-touted atheists seem to think that they alone possess the patent on the capability to utilize logic. Anyone who disagrees with them must by default be "illogical." Notice that they seem to think the ability to pronounce "evolution" correctly alone qualifies them to wear a gold star bearing the label "science-y." Many of them do not have a remarkable wealth of scientific knowledge outside the very narrow topic of evolution.
How about empathy, compassion, respect, care and concern for your fellow human beings? What about conducting oneself with self-respect and dignity? So-called logic-driven, scientifical, evolution-thumpers always seem to skip this very large faction of human cognitive function. Their brand of logic is, not surprisingly, a lot of bs.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment