IQ and other indicators of higher evolution apply to both men and women.
If women don’t have higher IQs, then they will not be able to have lives that are genuinely successful, happy, n fulfilling. [[ poss e.g., they are not promiscuous, they are much more choosy n wise when choosing sexual partners, n they don’t have nearly as many. They are more likely to choose useful college degrees; n they are better mothers, they have fewer children, and they are more devoted w time n energy into raising each child.
I think this is the big piece that is missing. — IQ indicators of women are in many ways the most important driving force for advancement and progress of the human race.
There is a seamlrss perfect link, a perfect glorois full-bodied flrshed-out perfect relation between women’s their ability to be good devoted mothers, and women’s iq. **perh this too could be a blazing mind-blowing epiph. this could be the fisrt time that I really truly discovered/ postulated this. that women’s iq is directly causality with their capability of being good mothers.
at end (should I bring up the opp evidence whichbis actually in fact indeed evidence for what I am saying?? wherein, women that breed like rats, are physically durable n sturdy n therefore that is why they produce large quantities of children? n that this is precisely the exact self-same reason whyyy they are not able to
notice how the cause n effect are effortlessly seamlessly grafted into one another. (You know I’m serious, as I never use the phrase ‘one another’ if I can help it.) Is she a poor (subpar) parent, because she produced too many kids? Or did she produce too many kids because she is low- IQ and never planned on being a devoted parent in the first place?
This is a thing that so many evo-psychologists always conveniently omit or skip over whenever discussing IQ. Notice the glaring hollow cognitive dissonance here. aha 2 things emerged. 1) they always insist that only physical indicators of health are indicators for evolution of woem. rahter than intelligence n emotional stability. 2) and due to this [[[__ damit cantt find words__]] how men have supposedly evolved, men choose partners for mating. prioritize only women’s physical hralth above all else, n to the detriment of all else. lartners rather than
.it is quite tidiculous that evo-psychs have really truly convinced themselves that wimne are going to seek moder-day-equivalent traist when choosing men.
yet simulteosuly they also think men are going to seek caveowmn traits in modern-day women.
If women don’t have higher IQs, then they will not be able to have lives that are genuinely successful, happy, n fulfilling. [[ poss e.g., they are not promiscuous, they are much more choosy n wise when choosing sexual partners, n they don’t have nearly as many. They are more likely to choose useful college degrees; n they are better mothers, they have fewer children, and they are more devoted w time n energy into raising each child.
I think this is the big piece that is missing. — IQ indicators of women are in many ways the most important driving force for advancement and progress of the human race.
There is a seamlrss perfect link, a perfect glorois full-bodied flrshed-out perfect relation between women’s their ability to be good devoted mothers, and women’s iq. **perh this too could be a blazing mind-blowing epiph. this could be the fisrt time that I really truly discovered/ postulated this. that women’s iq is directly causality with their capability of being good mothers.
at end (should I bring up the opp evidence whichbis actually in fact indeed evidence for what I am saying?? wherein, women that breed like rats, are physically durable n sturdy n therefore that is why they produce large quantities of children? n that this is precisely the exact self-same reason whyyy they are not able to
notice how the cause n effect are effortlessly seamlessly grafted into one another. (You know I’m serious, as I never use the phrase ‘one another’ if I can help it.) Is she a poor (subpar) parent, because she produced too many kids? Or did she produce too many kids because she is low- IQ and never planned on being a devoted parent in the first place?
This is a thing that so many evo-psychologists always conveniently omit or skip over whenever discussing IQ. Notice the glaring hollow cognitive dissonance here. aha 2 things emerged. 1) they always insist that only physical indicators of health are indicators for evolution of woem. rahter than intelligence n emotional stability. 2) and due to this [[[__ damit cantt find words__]] how men have supposedly evolved, men choose partners for mating. prioritize only women’s physical hralth above all else, n to the detriment of all else. lartners rather than
.it is quite tidiculous that evo-psychs have really truly convinced themselves that wimne are going to seek moder-day-equivalent traist when choosing men.
yet simulteosuly they also think men are going to seek caveowmn traits in modern-day women.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment