Now, make no mistake. I am ever proud to be from the same continent as our far east Asian brothers and sisters. I warmly regard them with great respect, cordiality, friendliness____
----as colleagues in the professional work force
---- and I have had the pleasure of counting them among my closest friends.
But we South Asians are distinctly a separate race. We are obviously a separate [[[ditinct]]] class offf heritage, ancestry, ethnic origins,,,,,
This is obvious.
I notice that mention of the South Asian subcontinent is conspicuously absent from any and all discussions of race and IQ.
elanoret bit more on how the blk IQ thing. AS in use 2nd(3rd) essay, after 1 asians 2 blacks.
::::
Let us [[inspect study]] this phenomenon in more detail_[[[[more profoundly thoroughly.
onn how the caste system of India has produced greatly varying IQ [[____repseentacvs]] at all extremes of spectrum.
(((*** tie this in with caste system of undai))))
It greatly embarrasses me to say this,, but it must be acknowledged. The Indo-Pakistani subcontinent is rife with crime, fraught with obliterating poverty. So if the Asian IQ thing is to be believed, how does this theory possibly explain the vast enormous discrepancy between [[he different socioeconomic classes of Indians? KeepinmindRemember this includes Bangladeshis.
caste system.
--so there was not a whole lot of opportunity for vertical mobility. Not a whole lot of chances to climb the social ranks.
If this [[blocking attitude]] [[ensconced, surrounded,,,]]] education and job opportunities, then this is not a good thing. People have a right to make their lives better. The way to do this is to [[[open up channels of jobs and money.]]]]..
However, if this caste system concerns marriage/dating/etc., I'll be honest. That does not really worry me. Shrug. Nobody has a "right" to marry someone above (or below) their socioeconomic class. If a lower-class person likes an upper-class person, and the upper-class person also happens to like the lower-class one and agrees to marry them, then great, go ahead. But this is not a human right.
----as colleagues in the professional work force
---- and I have had the pleasure of counting them among my closest friends.
But we South Asians are distinctly a separate race. We are obviously a separate [[[ditinct]]] class offf heritage, ancestry, ethnic origins,,,,,
This is obvious.
I notice that mention of the South Asian subcontinent is conspicuously absent from any and all discussions of race and IQ.
elanoret bit more on how the blk IQ thing. AS in use 2nd(3rd) essay, after 1 asians 2 blacks.
::::
Let us [[inspect study]] this phenomenon in more detail_[[[[more profoundly thoroughly.
onn how the caste system of India has produced greatly varying IQ [[____repseentacvs]] at all extremes of spectrum.
(((*** tie this in with caste system of undai))))
It greatly embarrasses me to say this,, but it must be acknowledged. The Indo-Pakistani subcontinent is rife with crime, fraught with obliterating poverty. So if the Asian IQ thing is to be believed, how does this theory possibly explain the vast enormous discrepancy between [[he different socioeconomic classes of Indians? KeepinmindRemember this includes Bangladeshis.
caste system.
--so there was not a whole lot of opportunity for vertical mobility. Not a whole lot of chances to climb the social ranks.
If this [[blocking attitude]] [[ensconced, surrounded,,,]]] education and job opportunities, then this is not a good thing. People have a right to make their lives better. The way to do this is to [[[open up channels of jobs and money.]]]]..
However, if this caste system concerns marriage/dating/etc., I'll be honest. That does not really worry me. Shrug. Nobody has a "right" to marry someone above (or below) their socioeconomic class. If a lower-class person likes an upper-class person, and the upper-class person also happens to like the lower-class one and agrees to marry them, then great, go ahead. But this is not a human right.