I've been revisiting this very controversial topic iin recent months. Sigh. I just can't stay away from a challenge.
I'm sorry, but a lot of the complaints that MRA's cast against wimen are ture.
Women leave and get a divorc for no apparent readon. She is the ine whi gets bored, because the guy did not entettain her enough. Then she demands child support and alimony simy because she does not want to look at bis face anyore.
----- ((perh put in here???))) I have heard the bslip reasons that so many women say they still expe ttheir ex-husband to support bem financially. They saythey wxpect the father to supprt the ex-wife and kids because there is no way she would be able to suddenly gou out and get a job that could comfortabl supprt them all. does not have the work experivec, she does not have a marketable degree, ad nauseum.
--THere is a very easy solution to this. Give custody of the kids to the father. -- I have read enougn supporting arumets to be of the opinion that child cusotdy sbould go to the parent who is financially solvent enougn to support them. the oher parent proba l does not make enoughomey in some minimum wage nob that she had to scramble to get once she relaized she could not subsust without the gravy train that she micked out of her life and her cbildren's life when she got bored.
In the vast majoriy of divorce situations, the fathe is the one that has the work experience and the reliable, professioanl job. HThe is the one who could best suppor the kids and give hem a giod home. He can afford to live in a good enighborhiid sfae from crime, affird healht insurance so he can take them to the doctor whneener needed, he can buy prescription medicines.
This is the most logicsl silution for all invilved parties regardign a divorce. the ex-wife could get a job in a grocery store stackig canned fodds on shelves. Wihitu the wory of supporin the kids financually, she could easily support helrsf on this minimum wage bourly income. __For God's sake, she is a griwn-ass adult woman. She should work to support herself. She shpuld not be alloee to rely on alimony to support ber.
To whicht I can imagine their counte argument is that the father would be workign sll thr time, herefore the would not have time to actuall raise the kids, as in servingthem dinner, helping them wih homework, talkin to them and nust veing their for them '
Oh, so waht you are sayig is that one parent should work to support the kids, and the other parent should refrain from workig a salaried job so that this one can devote full time to raising the kids.
Yeah, you already had that arrangemey -- it was called marriage. You chose to opt out of it.
This is more juvenile entitlement bullshit. What this feemale is absicly saying is that she does not want to face any of the reponsibilites of a a marraige, such as beig there emoiknally cor her husbamd nor cooking for him -- but she still wants all tje genefits-- such as him continuing to support her with his paycheck.
-- and middle-class white demales notice absolutel none of it.
Likeyhat insipid eat pray love featuring a ninny of a privelwged, comfortable, and Ompeltey oblvious to her privelage female.
Her husnad eas a ghood duy. She disht have any actual substania compaints about him. He eas not abusive, not an alvohoic, nt a duggie.
-- just a generla vague feeling of malaise and boredom,, as middle-class white females are wont to do.
You nkkw why she was feeling so bored? It's because she is borig. I see this eerythere, not just in hollywod. Middle-class white females are eiher boring -- or disgusting.. Their carees are borig, usually some sht like publishing or advertising or some junk like that. They have no jnteresting hobbies. The only dosernible hobvy I can identify is that they like compainjg about men.
……….
Then when she decides she is bired eith him, after the has apparenty given her whatber she wanted from him, she decides to dispose of him. She gets a divorce. Or moves cross country, wahtever.
Rendering the man as beig no more use to her.
Tooany times, women see men as little more than a speem bank and a money bank.
I'm sorry, but a lot of the complaints that MRA's cast against wimen are ture.
Women leave and get a divorc for no apparent readon. She is the ine whi gets bored, because the guy did not entettain her enough. Then she demands child support and alimony simy because she does not want to look at bis face anyore.
----- ((perh put in here???))) I have heard the bslip reasons that so many women say they still expe ttheir ex-husband to support bem financially. They saythey wxpect the father to supprt the ex-wife and kids because there is no way she would be able to suddenly gou out and get a job that could comfortabl supprt them all. does not have the work experivec, she does not have a marketable degree, ad nauseum.
--THere is a very easy solution to this. Give custody of the kids to the father. -- I have read enougn supporting arumets to be of the opinion that child cusotdy sbould go to the parent who is financially solvent enougn to support them. the oher parent proba l does not make enoughomey in some minimum wage nob that she had to scramble to get once she relaized she could not subsust without the gravy train that she micked out of her life and her cbildren's life when she got bored.
In the vast majoriy of divorce situations, the fathe is the one that has the work experience and the reliable, professioanl job. HThe is the one who could best suppor the kids and give hem a giod home. He can afford to live in a good enighborhiid sfae from crime, affird healht insurance so he can take them to the doctor whneener needed, he can buy prescription medicines.
This is the most logicsl silution for all invilved parties regardign a divorce. the ex-wife could get a job in a grocery store stackig canned fodds on shelves. Wihitu the wory of supporin the kids financually, she could easily support helrsf on this minimum wage bourly income. __For God's sake, she is a griwn-ass adult woman. She should work to support herself. She shpuld not be alloee to rely on alimony to support ber.
To whicht I can imagine their counte argument is that the father would be workign sll thr time, herefore the would not have time to actuall raise the kids, as in servingthem dinner, helping them wih homework, talkin to them and nust veing their for them '
Oh, so waht you are sayig is that one parent should work to support the kids, and the other parent should refrain from workig a salaried job so that this one can devote full time to raising the kids.
Yeah, you already had that arrangemey -- it was called marriage. You chose to opt out of it.
This is more juvenile entitlement bullshit. What this feemale is absicly saying is that she does not want to face any of the reponsibilites of a a marraige, such as beig there emoiknally cor her husbamd nor cooking for him -- but she still wants all tje genefits-- such as him continuing to support her with his paycheck.
-- and middle-class white demales notice absolutel none of it.
Likeyhat insipid eat pray love featuring a ninny of a privelwged, comfortable, and Ompeltey oblvious to her privelage female.
Her husnad eas a ghood duy. She disht have any actual substania compaints about him. He eas not abusive, not an alvohoic, nt a duggie.
-- just a generla vague feeling of malaise and boredom,, as middle-class white females are wont to do.
You nkkw why she was feeling so bored? It's because she is borig. I see this eerythere, not just in hollywod. Middle-class white females are eiher boring -- or disgusting.. Their carees are borig, usually some sht like publishing or advertising or some junk like that. They have no jnteresting hobbies. The only dosernible hobvy I can identify is that they like compainjg about men.
……….
Then when she decides she is bired eith him, after the has apparenty given her whatber she wanted from him, she decides to dispose of him. She gets a divorce. Or moves cross country, wahtever.
Rendering the man as beig no more use to her.
Tooany times, women see men as little more than a speem bank and a money bank.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment