(((((Let’s see how long this lasts before someone calls it on its bull3h:+.)))))
I have seen for a fact that women who are readers of various magazines -- People, Reader's Digest, that one punk women's mag (not necessarily fem, just punk, i.e., ugly with intentionally bad hair) angrily object to men being treated as sex objects pieces of meat. But they seem to have nary a qualm when women are treated in the exact same way.
Why in the world are we resorting to these negative stereotypes of men?
Why can’t a man’s expression of overt sexuality ever be seen as a good thing? It is a horrible cult of victimhood that we are perpetuating these myths and rumors. If a man is expressing his sexuality in public, that could be seen as a good thing if we as a society simply choose to see it as a good thing.
The current wave of girl power, i.e., feminism has gone to an even further degree to ignore men and their needs psychologically, emotionally, physically. The pendulum has swung too far the other way (pun intended). We encourage and support women to strip naked in the streets at all places all times. Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
However, we unwittingly have been forsaking men and their needs to express themselves sexually. All over society, we hear men and young boys are coaxed and guided to get rid of their virginity. And this is fine, of course. Evolution tells us that as soon as people reach puberty, there is really no compelling reason for them to remain chaste or pure. Which, by the way, are demeaning terms to resort to calling people.
But is this truly encouraging men to express themselves sexually? Think about it for a gentle moment. Are they wearing their sexuality on their sleeves the way empowered women do so? Whatever supposed sexuality in which men are engaging is behind closed doors. They are not truly expressing themselves out in public, in the everyday workaday, as a general routine of life. Whatever sexuality they might be practicing, we only see little glimpses and snippets of it sneaking around here and there. Being expressed freely and in an uninhibited manner.
When they have a sexual encounter over the weekend, how do they usually proceed?
As an intrinsic part of who they are, as a fiber of their very being?
Do they conduct themselves for the rest of the week as a sexually-aware, sexually-comfortable human?
Are they comfortable being sexual and liberated and expressive for themselves, for their own sexuality, unto and of itself, for their own sake, whether a woman is present or not?
Or as is much more often the case,
Do they usually express their sexuality only with that one given female?
Do they express their sex in the heat of the moment, only to return to a staid, buttoned-down existence the next day?
I have seen for a fact that women who are readers of various magazines -- People, Reader's Digest, that one punk women's mag (not necessarily fem, just punk, i.e., ugly with intentionally bad hair) angrily object to men being treated as sex objects pieces of meat. But they seem to have nary a qualm when women are treated in the exact same way.
Why in the world are we resorting to these negative stereotypes of men?
Why can’t a man’s expression of overt sexuality ever be seen as a good thing? It is a horrible cult of victimhood that we are perpetuating these myths and rumors. If a man is expressing his sexuality in public, that could be seen as a good thing if we as a society simply choose to see it as a good thing.
The current wave of girl power, i.e., feminism has gone to an even further degree to ignore men and their needs psychologically, emotionally, physically. The pendulum has swung too far the other way (pun intended). We encourage and support women to strip naked in the streets at all places all times. Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
However, we unwittingly have been forsaking men and their needs to express themselves sexually. All over society, we hear men and young boys are coaxed and guided to get rid of their virginity. And this is fine, of course. Evolution tells us that as soon as people reach puberty, there is really no compelling reason for them to remain chaste or pure. Which, by the way, are demeaning terms to resort to calling people.
But is this truly encouraging men to express themselves sexually? Think about it for a gentle moment. Are they wearing their sexuality on their sleeves the way empowered women do so? Whatever supposed sexuality in which men are engaging is behind closed doors. They are not truly expressing themselves out in public, in the everyday workaday, as a general routine of life. Whatever sexuality they might be practicing, we only see little glimpses and snippets of it sneaking around here and there. Being expressed freely and in an uninhibited manner.
When they have a sexual encounter over the weekend, how do they usually proceed?
As an intrinsic part of who they are, as a fiber of their very being?
Do they conduct themselves for the rest of the week as a sexually-aware, sexually-comfortable human?
Are they comfortable being sexual and liberated and expressive for themselves, for their own sexuality, unto and of itself, for their own sake, whether a woman is present or not?
Or as is much more often the case,
Do they usually express their sexuality only with that one given female?
Do they express their sex in the heat of the moment, only to return to a staid, buttoned-down existence the next day?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment